e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
For the transition period from ___to ___
Commission file number 1-13105
ARCH COAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
43-0921172
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
One CityPlace Drive, Suite 300, St. Louis, Missouri 63141
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (314) 994-2700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o
At
August 1, 2005, there were 63,777,908 shares of registrants common stock outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ARCH COAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
259,382 |
|
|
$ |
323,167 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
243,306 |
|
|
|
180,902 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
19,674 |
|
|
|
34,407 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
135,782 |
|
|
|
119,893 |
|
Prepaid royalties |
|
|
6,913 |
|
|
|
12,995 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
24,789 |
|
|
|
33,933 |
|
Other |
|
|
27,317 |
|
|
|
25,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
717,163 |
|
|
|
730,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2,065,591 |
|
|
|
2,033,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid royalties |
|
|
105,641 |
|
|
|
87,285 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
36,132 |
|
|
|
37,381 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
252,934 |
|
|
|
241,226 |
|
Other |
|
|
104,979 |
|
|
|
126,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
499,686 |
|
|
|
492,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,282,440 |
|
|
$ |
3,256,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
162,043 |
|
|
$ |
148,014 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
224,624 |
|
|
|
217,216 |
|
Current portion of debt |
|
|
5,008 |
|
|
|
9,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
391,675 |
|
|
|
375,054 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
974,045 |
|
|
|
1,001,323 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits other than pension |
|
|
395,500 |
|
|
|
380,424 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
182,103 |
|
|
|
179,965 |
|
Accrued workers compensation |
|
|
76,242 |
|
|
|
82,446 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
142,090 |
|
|
|
157,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,161,655 |
|
|
|
2,176,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
1,319,289 |
|
|
|
1,280,513 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(169,965 |
) |
|
|
(166,273 |
) |
Unearned compensation |
|
|
(4,508 |
) |
|
|
(1,830 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(5,047 |
) |
|
|
(5,047 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(19,656 |
) |
|
|
(28,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,120,785 |
|
|
|
1,079,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
3,282,440 |
|
|
$ |
3,256,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
ARCH COAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales |
|
$ |
633,797 |
|
|
$ |
422,778 |
|
|
$ |
1,234,262 |
|
|
$ |
826,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales |
|
|
542,073 |
|
|
|
364,083 |
|
|
|
1,061,714 |
|
|
|
712,621 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
52,142 |
|
|
|
36,080 |
|
|
|
103,045 |
|
|
|
72,185 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
17,979 |
|
|
|
11,717 |
|
|
|
40,255 |
|
|
|
26,630 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
12,498 |
|
|
|
6,853 |
|
|
|
25,545 |
|
|
|
12,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624,692 |
|
|
|
418,733 |
|
|
|
1,230,559 |
|
|
|
823,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,685 |
|
Gain on sale of units of Natural Resource Partners, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,955 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
12,388 |
|
|
|
14,513 |
|
|
|
43,743 |
|
|
|
29,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,388 |
|
|
|
20,825 |
|
|
|
43,743 |
|
|
|
129,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
21,493 |
|
|
|
24,870 |
|
|
|
47,446 |
|
|
|
131,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(19,389 |
) |
|
|
(14,101 |
) |
|
|
(37,460 |
) |
|
|
(28,842 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
3,526 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,708 |
) |
|
|
(13,198 |
) |
|
|
(33,934 |
) |
|
|
(27,229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-operating income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses resulting from early debt extinguishment
and termination of hedge accounting for interest
rate swaps |
|
|
(2,066 |
) |
|
|
(2,066 |
) |
|
|
(4,133 |
) |
|
|
(4,132 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
|
|
(1,864 |
) |
|
|
(4,063 |
) |
|
|
(3,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
9,808 |
|
|
|
9,449 |
|
|
|
100,791 |
|
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
19,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3,474 |
|
|
|
11,108 |
|
|
|
10,049 |
|
|
|
81,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
(3,594 |
) |
|
|
(3,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,677 |
|
|
$ |
9,311 |
|
|
$ |
6,455 |
|
|
$ |
77,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
63,494 |
|
|
|
54,582 |
|
|
|
63,140 |
|
|
|
54,206 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
64,520 |
|
|
|
55,550 |
|
|
|
64,158 |
|
|
|
62,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.0800 |
|
|
$ |
0.0800 |
|
|
$ |
0.1600 |
|
|
$ |
0.1375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
ARCH COAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,049 |
|
|
$ |
81,091 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
103,045 |
|
|
|
72,185 |
|
Prepaid royalties expensed |
|
|
10,687 |
|
|
|
7,853 |
|
Accretion on asset retirement obligations |
|
|
7,475 |
|
|
|
5,893 |
|
Net gain on disposition of assets |
|
|
(20,103 |
) |
|
|
(607 |
) |
Gain on sale of units of Natural Resource Partners, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89,955 |
) |
Income from equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,685 |
) |
Net distributions from equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,739 |
) |
Other nonoperating expense (income) |
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
3,759 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(47,371 |
) |
|
|
(40,495 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(15,889 |
) |
|
|
(13,399 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
21,521 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
4,729 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits other than pension |
|
|
15,076 |
|
|
|
11,625 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
(5,338 |
) |
|
|
(4,542 |
) |
Accrued workers compensation benefits |
|
|
(6,204 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
Federal income tax receipts |
|
|
14,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(8,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
94,261 |
|
|
|
19,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(139,355 |
) |
|
|
(69,132 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of units of Natural Resource Partners, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,365 |
|
Proceeds from dispositions of capital assets |
|
|
20,395 |
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
Additions to prepaid royalties |
|
|
(22,961 |
) |
|
|
(22,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(141,921 |
) |
|
|
14,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net payments on revolver and lines of credit |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(6,411 |
) |
|
|
(6,300 |
) |
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(2,298 |
) |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(13,741 |
) |
|
|
(11,062 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of common stock |
|
|
31,325 |
|
|
|
25,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(16,125 |
) |
|
|
7,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(63,785 |
) |
|
|
41,759 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
323,167 |
|
|
|
254,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
259,382 |
|
|
$ |
296,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2005
(UNAUDITED)
Note A General
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial reporting and
Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, but are subject to any year-end adjustments that
may be necessary. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Results of operations
for the period ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the
year ending December 31, 2005. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited financial statements and related notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31,
2004 included in Arch Coal, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Arch Coal, Inc. (the Company) is engaged in the production of steam and metallurgical coal from
surface and deep mines throughout the United States, for sale to utility, industrial and export
markets. The Companys mines are primarily located in the Powder River Basin, Central Appalachia
and Western Bituminous regions of the United States. All subsidiaries (except as noted below) are
wholly owned. Intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Companys Wyoming, Colorado and Utah coal operations are included in a joint venture named Arch
Western Resources, LLC (Arch Western). Arch Western is 99% owned by the Company and 1% owned by
BP Amoco. The Company also acts as the managing member of Arch Western.
On July 31, 2004, the Company acquired the remaining 35% of Canyon Fuel Company, LLC (Canyon
Fuel) that it did not already own. See Note C Business Combinations for further discussion.
Income from Canyon Fuel through June 30, 2004 is reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations as income from equity investments (see additional discussion in Note E Equity
Investments).
Note B Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On March 30, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ratified the consensus reached
by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on issue No. 04-6, Accounting for Stripping Costs in the
Mining Industry. This issue applies to stripping costs incurred in the production phase of a mine
for the removal of overburden or waste materials for the purpose of obtaining access to coal that
will be extracted. Under the new rule, stripping costs incurred during the production phase of the
mine are variable production costs that are included in the cost of inventory produced and
extracted during the period the stripping costs are incurred. Historically, the coal industry has
considered coal uncovered at a surface mining operation but not yet extracted to be coal inventory
(pit inventory). This is a change in accounting practice. The guidance in this EITF consensus is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 for which the cumulative effect of
adoption should be recognized as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings during
the period. The Company is evaluating what impact this guidance will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset
Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143. This interpretation clarifies
that the term conditional asset retirement obligation, as used in FASB Statement No. 143, refers
to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of
settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the
entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though
uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. Thus, the timing and/or method of
settlement may be conditional on a future event. Accordingly, an entity is required to recognize a
liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the
liability can be reasonably estimated. The fair value of a liability for the conditional asset
retirement obligation should be recognized when incurred, generally upon acquisition, construction,
or development and/or through the normal operation of the asset. Uncertainty about the timing
and/or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation should be factored into
the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. SFAS No. 143 acknowledges
that, in some cases, sufficient information may not be available to reasonably estimate the fair
value of an asset retirement obligation. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a
material impact on its financial statements.
4
Note C Business Combinations
Canyon Fuel 35% Acquisition
On July 31, 2004, the Company purchased the 35% interest in Canyon Fuel that it did not own from
ITOCHU Corporation. The purchase price, including related costs and fees, of $112.2 million was
funded with cash of $90.2 million and a five-year, $22.0 million non-interest bearing note. Net of
cash acquired, the fair value of the transaction totaled $97.4 million. As a result of the
acquisition, the Company owns substantially all of the ownership interests of Canyon Fuel and no
longer accounts for its investment in Canyon Fuel on the equity method but consolidates Canyon Fuel
in its financial statements. The results of operations of the Canyon Fuel mines are included in the
Companys Western Bituminous segment.
The purchase accounting allocation related to the acquisition has been recorded in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements as of, and for the period subsequent to, July 31, 2004. The
following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at
the date of acquisition (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
7,432 |
|
Materials and supplies |
|
|
3,751 |
|
Coal inventory |
|
|
7,434 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
6,466 |
|
Property, plant, equipment and mine development |
|
|
125,881 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(10,379 |
) |
Coal supply agreements |
|
|
(33,378 |
) |
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
(9,823 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price, net of cash received of $11.0 million |
|
$ |
97,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts allocated to coal supply agreements noted in the table above represent the liability
established for the net below-market coal supply agreements to be amortized over the remaining
terms of the contracts. The liability is classified as an other noncurrent liability on the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining amortization period on these
acquired coal supply agreements ranges from one to 42 months.
Triton Acquisition
On August 20, 2004, the Company acquired (1) Vulcan Coal Holdings, L.L.C., which owns all of the
common equity of Triton Coal Company, LLC (Triton), and (2) all of the preferred units of Triton,
for a purchase price of $382.1 million, including transaction costs and working capital
adjustments. In 2003, Triton was the nations sixth largest coal producer and operated two mines in
the Powder River Basin: North Rochelle and Buckskin. Following the consummation of the transaction,
the Company completed an agreement to sell Buckskin to Kiewit Mining Acquisition Company. The net
sales price for this second transaction was $73.1 million. The total purchase price, including
related costs and fees, was funded with cash on hand, including the proceeds from the Buckskin
sale, $22.0 million in borrowings under the Companys existing revolving credit facility and a
$100.0 million term loan at its Arch Western Resources subsidiary. Upon acquisition, the Company
integrated the North Rochelle mine with its existing Black Thunder mine in the Powder River Basin.
The purchase accounting allocations related to the acquisition have been recorded in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements as of, and for the periods subsequent to August 20,
2004. The following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities
assumed at the date of acquisition (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
14,233 |
|
Materials and supplies |
|
|
4,161 |
|
Coal inventory |
|
|
4,874 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,200 |
|
Property, plant, equipment and mine development |
|
|
325,194 |
|
Coal supply agreements |
|
|
8,486 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
36,132 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(72,326 |
) |
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
(14,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price, net of cash received of $0.4 million |
|
$ |
308,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
Amounts allocated to coal supply agreements noted in the table above represent the value attributed
to the net above-market coal supply agreements to be amortized over the remaining terms of the
contracts. The remaining amortization period on these acquired coal supply agreements ranges from
six to 18 months.
Included in the amounts allocated to accounts payable and accrued expenses noted in the table above
are $5.5 million of liabilities incurred in connection with terminating Vulcan employees upon
acquisition. Upon acquisition, the Company identified 24 employees of Vulcan who were terminated as
part of the integration of the North Rochelle mine into the Companys Black Thunder mine. All
amounts accrued for severance were paid as of December 31, 2004.
Pro Forma Financial Information
If Triton and Canyon Fuel had been included in the Companys results of operations during the three
months ended June 30, 2004, its unaudited pro forma revenues would have been $537.5 million,
unaudited proforma net income available to common shareholders would have been $9.6 million and
unaudited proforma basic and diluted earnings per share would have
been $0.16 and $0.16,
respectively. If Triton and Canyon Fuel had been included in the Companys results of operations
during the six months ended June 30, 2004, its unaudited pro forma revenues would have been
$1,034.9 million, unaudited pro forma net income available to common shareholders would have been
$69.1 million and unaudited pro forma basic and diluted earnings
per share would have been $1.27
and $1.17, respectively.
Note D Stock-Based Compensation
These interim financial statements include the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (FAS 123), as amended by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -
Transition and Disclosure (FAS 148). With respect to accounting for its stock options, as
permitted under FAS 123, the Company has retained the intrinsic value method prescribed by
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25),
and related Interpretations. Had compensation expense for stock option grants been determined based
on the fair value at the grant dates consistent with the method required by FAS 123, the Companys
net income available to common shareholders and earnings per common share would have been changed
to the pro forma amounts as indicated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
Net income available to common
shareholders, as reported |
|
$ |
1,677 |
|
|
$ |
9,311 |
|
|
$ |
6,455 |
|
|
$ |
77,497 |
|
Add: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based employee compensation
included in reported net income,
net of related tax effects |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
8,617 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for
all awards, net of related tax
effects |
|
|
(1,774 |
) |
|
|
(1,679 |
) |
|
|
(10,644 |
) |
|
|
(3,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income available to
common shareholders |
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
$ |
7,980 |
|
|
$ |
4,428 |
|
|
$ |
74,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share as reported |
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
Basic earnings per share pro forma |
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
|
Diluted earnings per share as reported |
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
Diluted earnings per share pro forma |
|
|
.01 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.07 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R), which requires all public companies to measure
compensation cost in the income statement for all share-based payments (including employee stock
options) at fair value for interim and annual periods. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) delayed the implementation of FAS 123R from its original implementation
date by six months for most registrants, requiring all public companies to adopt FAS 123R no later
than the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. As such, the
6
Company intends to adopt FAS 123R on January 1, 2006 using the modified-prospective method. FAS
123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be
reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current
literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash
flows in periods after adoption. The Company has not yet determined the impact of adoption on its
financial statements.
On January 14, 2004, the Company granted an award of 220,766 shares of performance-contingent
phantom stock that vested in the event the Companys stock price reached an average pre-established
price over a period of 20 consecutive trading days within five years following the date of grant.
On March 3, 2005, the price contingency discussed above was met, and the award was paid in a
combination of Company stock ($7.3 million) and cash ($2.6 million). As such, the Company
recognized a $9.9 million charge as a component of selling, general and administrative expense
($9.1 million) and cost of coal sales ($0.8 million) in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations in the first quarter of 2005.
Note E Equity Investments
As of June 30, 2005, the Company no longer held equity investments. The Company purchased the
remaining 35% interest in Canyon Fuel on July 31, 2004. Prior to July 31, 2004, the Company
accounted for its investment in Canyon Fuel on the equity method. In addition, on March 10, 2004,
the Company sold the majority of its interest in Natural Resource Partners, LP (NRP). Prior to
March 10, 2004, the Company accounted for its investment in NRP on the equity method. Amounts
recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Income from equity investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from investment in Canyon Fuel |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,267 |
|
Income from NRP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from equity investments as reported
in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Canyon Fuel
The following table presents unaudited summarized financial information for Canyon Fuel:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
Condensed Income Statement Information |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
69,325 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
122,708 |
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before cumulative effect
of accounting change |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,378 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65% of Canyon Fuel net income before
cumulative effect of accounting
change |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,796 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,169 |
|
Effect of purchase adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arch Coals income from its equity
investment in Canyon Fuel |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through July 31, 2004, the Companys income from its equity investment in Canyon Fuel represented
65% of Canyon Fuels net income after adjusting for the effect of purchase adjustments related to
its investment in Canyon Fuel. The Companys investment in Canyon Fuel reflected purchase
adjustments primarily related to the reduction in amounts assigned to sales contracts, mineral
reserves and other property, plant and equipment. The purchase adjustments were amortized
consistent with the underlying assets of the joint venture.
Investment in NRP
7
During 2004, the Company sold its remaining limited partnership units of NRP in three separate
transactions occurring in March, June and October. Specifically during the six months ended June
30, 2004, the Company sold the majority of its remaining limited partnership units of NRP for
proceeds of approximately $105.4 million. The sale resulted in a gain of $90.0 million.
Note F Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Company has non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain of its salaried and
non-union hourly employees. Benefits are generally based on the employees years of service and
compensation. The Company funds the plans in an amount not less than the minimum statutory funding
requirements nor more than the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes.
The Company also currently provides certain postretirement medical/life insurance coverage for
eligible employees. Generally, covered employees who terminate employment after meeting eligibility
requirements are eligible for postretirement coverage for themselves and their dependents. The
salaried employee postretirement medical/life plans are contributory, with retiree contributions
adjusted periodically, and contain other cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance.
The postretirement medical plan for retirees who were members of the United Mine Workers of America
(UMWA) is not contributory. The Companys current funding policy is to fund the cost of all
postretirement medical/life insurance benefits as they are paid.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The following table details the components of pension and other postretirement benefit costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
Pension benefits |
|
benefits |
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Service cost |
|
$ |
3,072 |
|
|
$ |
1,876 |
|
|
$ |
1,254 |
|
|
$ |
886 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
|
|
7,803 |
|
|
|
7,399 |
|
Expected return on plan assets* |
|
|
(5,478 |
) |
|
|
(3,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other amortization and deferral |
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
6,456 |
|
|
|
4,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,874 |
|
|
$ |
15,513 |
|
|
$ |
12,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other postretirement |
|
|
Pension benefits |
|
benefits |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Service cost |
|
$ |
5,999 |
|
|
$ |
3,915 |
|
|
$ |
2,542 |
|
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
6,696 |
|
|
|
5,607 |
|
|
|
15,696 |
|
|
|
14,724 |
|
Expected return on plan assets* |
|
|
(8,245 |
) |
|
|
(6,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other amortization and deferral |
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
12,533 |
|
|
|
8,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,800 |
|
|
$ |
4,862 |
|
|
$ |
30,771 |
|
|
$ |
25,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The Company does not fund its other postretirement liabilities. |
Employer Contributions
While the Company did not make any contributions to the pension plan during the six months ended
June 30, 2005, it is currently considering a contribution to the plan in 2005 but has not yet made
a determination as to the timing and the amount of the potential contribution. The Company has no
minimum contribution required.
Note G Other Comprehensive Income
Other comprehensive income items under FAS 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, are transactions
recorded in stockholders equity during the year, excluding net income and transactions with
stockholders. The following table presents comprehensive income:
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,474 |
|
|
$ |
11,108 |
|
|
$ |
10,049 |
|
|
$ |
81,091 |
|
Other comprehensive
income, net of income
taxes |
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
2,616 |
|
|
|
8,541 |
|
|
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
6,820 |
|
|
$ |
13,724 |
|
|
$ |
18,590 |
|
|
$ |
86,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 consists
primarily of the reclassification of previously deferred mark-to-market adjustments from other
comprehensive income to net income and mark-to-market adjustments related to the Companys
financial derivatives which still qualify as effective hedges.
Note H Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Coal |
|
$ |
83,158 |
|
|
$ |
76,009 |
|
Repair parts and supplies |
|
|
52,624 |
|
|
|
43,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
135,782 |
|
|
$ |
119,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note I Debt
Debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Indebtedness to banks under lines of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Indebtedness to banks under revolving credit agreement,
expiring December 22, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
6.75% senior notes ($950.0 million face value) due July 1, 2013 |
|
|
960,930 |
|
|
|
961,613 |
|
Promissory note |
|
|
16,124 |
|
|
|
17,523 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,999 |
|
|
|
7,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979,053 |
|
|
|
1,011,147 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
5,008 |
|
|
|
9,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
974,045 |
|
|
$ |
1,001,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 22, 2004, the Company entered into a $700.0 million revolving credit facility that
matures on December 22, 2009. The rate of interest on borrowings under the credit facility is a
floating rate based on LIBOR. The Companys credit facility is secured by substantially all of its
assets as well as its ownership interests in substantially all of its subsidiaries, except its
ownership interests in Arch Western and its subsidiaries. The credit facility replaced the
Companys existing $350.0 million revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2005, the Company had
$103.5 million in letters of credit outstanding, resulting in $596.5 million of unused borrowings
under the revolver. Financial covenant requirements may restrict the amount of unused capacity
available to the Company for borrowings and letters of credit. As of June 30, 2005, the Company
was not restricted by financial covenants.
On October 22, 2004, the Company issued $250.0 million of 6.75% Senior Notes due 2013 at a price of
104.75% of par. Interest on the notes is payable on January 1 and July 1 of each year, beginning on
January 1, 2005. The senior notes were issued under an indenture dated June 25, 2003, under which
the Company previously issued $700.0 million of 6.75% Senior Notes due 2013. The senior notes are
guaranteed by Arch Western and certain of Arch Westerns subsidiaries and are secured by a security
interest in loans made to Arch Coal by Arch Western. The terms of the senior notes contain
restrictive covenants that limit Arch Westerns ability to, among other things, incur additional
debt, sell or transfer assets, and make certain investments.
9
On July 31, 2004, the Company issued a five-year, $22.0 million non-interest bearing note to help
fund the Canyon Fuel acquisition. At its issuance, the note was discounted to its present value
using a rate of 7.0%. The promissory note is payable in quarterly installments of $1.0 million
through July 2008 and $1.5 million from October 2008 through July 2009.
Note J Contingencies
The Company is a party to numerous claims and lawsuits with respect to various matters. The
Company provides for costs related to contingencies when a loss is probable and the amount is
reasonably determinable. After conferring with counsel, it is the opinion of management that the
ultimate resolution of these claims, to the extent not previously provided for, will not have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity
of the Company.
Note K Transactions or Events Affecting Comparability of Reported Results
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company participated in a settlement from its insurance
broker related to certain types of commissions previously paid and recognized a gain of $1.0
million. The gain is reflected in other operating income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company assigned its rights and obligations to an unused
loadout facility to a third party resulting in a gain of $1.7 million. Of the $1.7 million gain
recognized, $1.2 million was recorded as an increase to other operating income in the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations while $0.5 million was reflected as a reduction in cost of
coal sales in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations representing the elimination of
the reclamation obligation associated with this facility.
During the second quarter of 2005, the State of Wyoming completed an audit related to severance
taxes for the period of 1999 through 2001. The audit resulted in the Company being assessed
additional taxes. The Company is reviewing the assessment and has recorded a liability of $4.0
million on its books related to the audit. Of the $4.0 million recorded, $2.6 million was recorded
in cost of coal sales in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, while
$1.4 million, representing interest associated with the assessment, was recorded as interest
expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company assigned its rights and obligations on several
parcels of land to a third party resulting in a gain of $9.3 million. The gain is reflected in
other operating income in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company recognized a gain of $9.5 million resulting from
various equipment sales. The gain is reported as other operating income in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Office of Surface Mining completed an audit of
certain of the Companys federal reclamation fee filings for the period from 1998 through 2003. The
audit resulted in the Company being assessed additional fees of $1.3 million and interest of $0.2
million. The additional fees have been recorded as a component of cost of coal sales in the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, while the interest portion has been
reflected as interest expense.
During the first quarter of 2004, Canyon Fuel, while accounted for under the equity method, began
the process of temporarily idling its Skyline Mine, and incurred severance costs of $1.3 million
and $3.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. The Companys
share of these costs totals $0.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and is reflected in income
from equity investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company finalized the negotiation of price adjustments on
two long-term contracts. These price adjustments are retroactive to January 1, 2004. Adjustments
for shipments completed prior to the second quarter of 2004 totaled $1.9 million, which has been
recorded as other operating income in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations
10
On June 25, 2003, the Company repaid the $675 million term loan of its Arch Western subsidiary with
the proceeds from the offering of $700.0 million in senior notes. The Company had designated
certain interest rate swaps as hedges of the variable rate interest payments due under the Arch
Western term loans. Pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 133), historical
mark-to-market adjustments related to these swaps through June 25, 2003 were deferred as a
component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. Subsequent to the repayment of the term loans,
these deferred amounts will be amortized as additional expense over the contractual terms of the
swap agreements. For the three months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company recognized $2.1
million of expense for both periods related to the amortization of previously deferred
mark-to-market adjustments. For the six months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, the Company
recognized $4.1 million of expense for both periods related to the amortization of previously
deferred mark-to-market adjustments.
Note L Earnings Per Share
The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share from
continuing operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Numerator |
|
Denominator |
|
Per Share |
|
|
(Income) |
|
(Shares) |
|
Amount |
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,474 |
|
|
|
63,494 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of common stock equivalents arising from
stock options and restricted stock grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,677 |
|
|
|
64,520 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
Numerator |
|
Denominator |
|
Per Share |
|
|
(Income) |
|
(Shares) |
|
Amount |
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,108 |
|
|
|
54,582 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
9,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of common stock equivalents arising from
stock options and restricted stock grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income available to common shareholders. |
|
$ |
9,311 |
|
|
|
55,550 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Numerator |
|
Denominator |
|
Per Share |
|
|
(Income) |
|
(Shares) |
|
Amount |
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,049 |
|
|
|
63,140 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(3,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
6,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of common stock equivalents arising from
stock options and restricted stock grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income available to common shareholders. |
|
$ |
6,455 |
|
|
|
64,158 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
Numerator |
|
Denominator |
|
Per Share |
|
|
(Income) |
|
(Shares) |
|
Amount |
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
81,091 |
|
|
|
54,206 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(3,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
77,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of common stock equivalents arising from stock options and
restricted stock grants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of common stock equivalents arising from convertible preferred stock |
|
|
3,594 |
|
|
|
6,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
81,091 |
|
|
|
62,021 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note M Guarantees
The Company holds a 17.5% general partnership interest in Dominion Terminal Associates (DTA),
which operates a ground storage-to-vessel coal transloading facility in Newport News, Virginia. DTA
leases the facility from Peninsula Ports Authority of Virginia (PPAV) for amounts sufficient to
meet debt-service requirements. Financing is provided through $132.8 million of tax-exempt bonds
issued by PPAV (of which the Company is responsible for 17.5%, or $23.2 million) that mature July
1, 2016. Under the terms of a throughput and handling agreement with DTA, each partner is charged
its share of cash operating and debt-service costs in exchange for the right to use its share of
the facilitys loading capacity and is required to make periodic cash advances to DTA to fund such
costs. On a cumulative basis, costs exceeded cash advances by $14.7 million at June 30, 2005 (such
amount is included in other noncurrent liabilities). Future payments for fixed operating costs and
debt service are estimated to approximate $2.7 million annually through 2015 and $26.0 million in
2016.
In connection with the Companys acquisition of the coal operations of Atlantic Richfield Company
(ARCO) and the simultaneous combination of the acquired ARCO operations and the Companys Wyoming
operations into the Arch Western joint venture, the Company agreed to indemnify another member of
Arch Western against certain tax liabilities in the event that such liabilities arise as a result
of certain actions taken prior to June 1, 2013, including the sale or other disposition of certain
properties of Arch Western, the repurchase of certain equity interests in Arch Western by Arch
Western or the reduction under certain circumstances of indebtedness incurred by Arch Western in
connection with the acquisition. Depending on the time at which any such indemnification obligation
were to arise, it could have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and
financial condition of the Company.
Note N Segment Information
The Company produces steam and metallurgical coal from surface and deep mines for sale to utility,
industrial and export markets. The Company operates only in the United States, with mines in the
major low-sulfur coal basins. The Company has three reportable business segments, which are based
on the coal basins in which the Company operates. Coal quality, coal seam height, transportation
methods and regulatory issues are generally consistent within a basin. Accordingly, market and
contract pricing have developed by coal basin. The Company manages its coal sales by coal basin,
not by individual mine complex. Mine operations are evaluated based on their per-ton operating
costs (defined as including all mining costs but excluding pass-through transportation expenses).
The Companys reportable segments are Powder River Basin (PRB), Central Appalachia (CAPP) and
Western Bituminous (WBIT). The Companys operations in the Powder River Basin are located in
Wyoming and include one operating surface mine and one idle surface mine. The Companys operations
in Central Appalachia are located in southern West Virginia, eastern Kentucky, and Virginia and
include 18 underground mines and nine surface mines. The Companys Western Bituminous operations
are located in southern Wyoming, Colorado and Utah and include four underground mines and two
surface mines (the surface mines were both placed into reclamation mode in 2004).
Operating segment results for the three and six months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004 are presented
below. Results for the operating segments include all direct costs of mining. Corporate, Other and
Eliminations includes corporate overhead, land management, other support functions, and the
elimination of intercompany transactions.
Three months ending June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per ton amounts) |
|
PRB |
|
CAPP |
|
WBIT |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Coal sales |
|
$ |
179,005 |
|
|
$ |
349,758 |
|
|
$ |
105,034 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
633,797 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
15,904 |
|
|
|
(5,050 |
) |
|
|
26,746 |
|
|
|
(16,107 |
) |
|
|
21,493 |
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per ton amounts) |
|
PRB |
|
CAPP |
|
WBIT |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Total assets |
|
|
1,182,995 |
|
|
|
2,167,927 |
|
|
|
1,701,858 |
|
|
|
(1,770,340 |
) |
|
|
3,282,440 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
25,970 |
|
|
|
17,192 |
|
|
|
8,690 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
52,142 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
8,507 |
|
|
|
58,345 |
|
|
|
11,541 |
|
|
|
2,726 |
|
|
|
81,119 |
|
Operating cost per ton |
|
|
7.38 |
|
|
|
42.54 |
|
|
|
14.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ending June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per ton amounts) |
|
PRB |
|
CAPP |
|
WBIT |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Coal sales |
|
$ |
122,650 |
|
|
$ |
275,687 |
|
|
$ |
24,441 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
422,778 |
|
Income from equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,995 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
14,943 |
|
|
|
9,149 |
|
|
|
8,936 |
|
|
|
(8,158 |
) |
|
|
24,870 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,016,134 |
|
|
|
2,027,485 |
|
|
|
939,508 |
|
|
|
(1,484,778 |
) |
|
|
2,498,349 |
|
Equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,042 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
16,053 |
|
|
|
15,735 |
|
|
|
3,847 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
36,080 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
11,342 |
|
|
|
21,186 |
|
|
|
2,319 |
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
37,478 |
|
Operating cost per ton |
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
|
35.17 |
|
|
|
15.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ending June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per ton amounts) |
|
PRB |
|
CAPP |
|
WBIT |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Coal sales |
|
$ |
370,789 |
|
|
$ |
660,730 |
|
|
$ |
202,743 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,234,262 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
43,578 |
|
|
|
(2,440 |
) |
|
|
39,106 |
|
|
|
(32,798 |
) |
|
|
47,446 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
52,436 |
|
|
|
33,004 |
|
|
|
17,020 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
103,045 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
17,001 |
|
|
|
93,821 |
|
|
|
24,963 |
|
|
|
3,573 |
|
|
|
139,358 |
|
Operating cost per ton |
|
|
6.93 |
|
|
|
42.48 |
|
|
|
14.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ending June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per ton amounts) |
|
PRB |
|
CAPP |
|
WBIT |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
Coal sales |
|
$ |
237,456 |
|
|
$ |
534,769 |
|
|
$ |
54,043 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
826,268 |
|
Income from equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,267 |
|
|
|
2,418 |
|
|
|
9,685 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
30,761 |
|
|
|
19,779 |
|
|
|
11,457 |
|
|
|
69,782 |
|
|
|
131,779 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
31,505 |
|
|
|
31,866 |
|
|
|
7,932 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
72,185 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
34,166 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
69,132 |
|
Operating cost per ton |
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
33.56 |
|
|
|
16.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of segment income from operations to consolidated income before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Total segment income from operations |
|
$ |
21,493 |
|
|
$ |
24,870 |
|
|
$ |
47,446 |
|
|
$ |
131,779 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(19,389 |
) |
|
|
(14,101 |
) |
|
|
(37,460 |
) |
|
|
(28,842 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
3,526 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
Other non-operating expense |
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
|
|
(1,864 |
) |
|
|
(4,063 |
) |
|
|
(3,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
2,174 |
|
|
$ |
9,808 |
|
|
$ |
9,449 |
|
|
$ |
100,791 |
|
|
|
|
Note O Reclassifications
13
Certain amounts in the 2004 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
classifications in the 2005 financial statements with no effect on previously reported net income
or members equity.
14
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
In this quarterly report, statements that are not reported financial results or other
historical information are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give current
expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. They are
based on our managements expectations that involve a number of business risks and uncertainties,
any of which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by
the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to
historic or current facts. They use words such as anticipate, estimate, project, intend,
plan, believe and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of
future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to:
|
|
|
our expectation of continued growth in the demand for our coal by the domestic electric
generation industry; |
|
|
|
|
our belief that legislation and regulations relating to the Clean Air Act and other
proposed environmental initiatives and the relatively higher costs of competing fuels will
increase demand for our compliance and low sulfur coal; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding incentives to generators of electricity to minimize their
fuel costs as a result of electric utility deregulation; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that we will continue to have adequate liquidity from cash flow from operations; |
|
|
|
|
a variety of market, operational, geologic, permitting, labor, transportation and weather related factors; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding any synergies to be derived from the Triton acquisition; and |
|
|
|
|
the other risks and uncertainties which are described below under Contingencies and
Certain Trends and Uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the following: |
|
o |
|
Due to the significant amount of our debt, a downturn in economic or industry
conditions could materially affect our ability to meet our future financial and
liquidity obligations. |
|
|
o |
|
A reduction in consumption by the domestic electric generation industry may cause
our profitability to decline. |
|
|
o |
|
Extensive environmental laws and regulations could cause the volume of our sales
to decline. |
|
|
o |
|
The coal industry is highly regulated, which restricts our ability to conduct
mining operations and may cause our profitability to decline. |
|
|
o |
|
We may not be able to obtain or renew our surety bonds on acceptable terms. |
|
|
o |
|
Unanticipated mining conditions may cause profitability to fluctuate. |
|
|
o |
|
Intense competition and excess industry capacity in the coal producing regions
has adversely affected our revenues and may continue to do so in the future. |
|
|
o |
|
Deregulation of the electric utility industry may cause customers to be more
price-sensitive, resulting in a potential decline in our profitability. |
|
|
o |
|
Our profitability may be adversely affected by the status of our long-term coal supply contracts. |
|
|
o |
|
Decreases in purchases of coal by our largest customers could adversely affect our revenues. |
15
|
o |
|
An unavailability of coal reserves would cause our profitability to decline. |
|
|
o |
|
Disruption in, or increased costs of, transportation services could adversely affect our profitability. |
|
|
o |
|
Numerous uncertainties exist in estimating our economically recoverable coal
reserves, and inaccuracies in our estimates could result in lower revenues, higher costs
or decreased profitability. |
|
|
o |
|
Title defects or loss of leasehold interests in our properties could result in
unanticipated costs or an inability to mine these properties. |
|
|
o |
|
All acquisitions involve a number of inherent risks, any of which could cause us
not to realize the benefits anticipated to result. |
|
|
o |
|
Changes in our credit ratings could adversely affect our costs and expenses. |
|
|
o |
|
Some of our agreements impose significant potential indemnification obligations on us. |
|
|
o |
|
Our expenditures for postretirement medical and pension benefits have increased
in recent periods and could further increase in the future. |
|
|
o |
|
Pending litigation involving third parties may impact our cash balance pension
plan and the retirement account formula used in its administration. |
|
|
o |
|
Any inability to comply with restrictions imposed by our credit facilities and
other debt arrangements could result in a default under these agreements. |
|
|
o |
|
Our estimated financial results may prove to be inaccurate. |
We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statements will be realized, although we believe that
we have been prudent in our plans and assumptions. Achievement of future results is subject to
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may prove to be inaccurate. Should known or unknown risks
or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove to be inaccurate, actual
results could vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law. You are advised,
however, to consider any additional disclosures that we may make on related subjects in future
filings with the SEC. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all
factors that could cause our actual results to differ. Consequently, you should not consider any
such list to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Items Affecting Comparability of Reported Results
The comparison of our operating results for the quarter-to-date and year-to-date periods ending
June 30, 2005 and 2004 are affected by the following items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on land sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Gain on equipment sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on facility sales |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance broker settlement |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming severance tax assessment |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term incentive compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in millions) |
|
Quarter ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Gain on sale of NRP units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
Severance costs Skyline Mine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Contract rate adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Reclamation fee assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact on operating income and net interest
expense |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
88.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses resulting from early debt
extinguishment and termination of hedge
accounting for interest rate swaps |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Reclamation fee assessment interest portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impact on pre-tax income |
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
84.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from land sales
During the first quarter of 2005, we assigned our rights and obligations on several parcels of land
to a third party resulting in a gain of $9.3 million. The gain is reflected in other operating
income in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Gain from equipment sales
During the first quarter of 2005, we recognized a gain of $9.5 million resulting from various
equipment sales. The gain is reported as other operating income in the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Gain from facility sales
During the second quarter of 2005, we assigned our rights and obligations to an unused loadout
facility to a third party resulting in a gain of $1.7 million. Of the $1.7 million gain recognized,
$1.2 million was recorded as an increase to other revenues in the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations while $0.5 million was reflected as a reduction in cost of coal sales in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations representing the elimination of the reclamation
obligation associated with this facility.
Insurance broker settlement
During the second quarter of 2005, we participated in a settlement from our insurance broker
related to certain types of commissions previously paid and recognized a gain of $1.0 million. The
gain is reflected in other operating income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Wyoming severance tax assessment
During the second quarter of 2005, the State of Wyoming completed an audit related to severance
taxes for the period of 1999 through 2001. The audit resulted in additional taxes being assessed
against us. We are reviewing the assessment and have recorded a liability of $4.0 million on our
books related to the audit. Of the $4.0 million recognized, $2.6 million was recorded in cost of
coal sales in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, while $1.4 million,
representing interest associated with the assessment, was recorded as interest expense in the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Long-term incentive compensation expense
During 2004, we granted an award of 220,766 shares of performance-contingent phantom stock that
vested in the event the Companys stock price reached an average pre-established price over a
period of 20 consecutive trading days within five years following the date of grant. During the
first quarter of 2005, the price contingency discussed above was met, and the award was paid in a
combination of Company stock and cash. As such, we recognized a $9.9 million charge as a component
of selling, general and administrative expense ($9.1 million) and cost of coal sales ($0.8 million)
in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
17
Gain on sale of NRP units
During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we sold the majority of our remaining limited
partnership units of Natural Resource Partners, LP (NRP) for proceeds of approximately $105.4
million. The sales resulted in a gain of $90.0 million.
Severance costs Skyline Mine
During the first quarter of 2004, Canyon Fuel, our equity method investment, began the process of
idling its Skyline Mine (the idling process was completed in May 2004), and incurred severance
costs of $1.3 million and $3.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004,
respectively. Our 65% share of these costs totals $0.9 million and $2.1 million (which was prior to
our purchase of the remaining 35% interest), respectively, and is reflected in income from equity
investments in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Contract rate adjustments
During the second quarter of 2004, we finalized the negotiation of price adjustments on two
long-term contracts. These price adjustments are retroactive to January 1, 2004. Adjustments for
shipments prior to the second quarter of 2004 totaled $1.9 million, which has been recorded as
other operating income in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Reclamation fee assessment
During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Office of Surface Mining completed an audit of
certain of our federal reclamation fee filings for the period from 1998 through 2003. The audit
resulted in an assessment of additional fees of $1.3 million and interest of $0.2 million. The
additional fees have been recorded as a component of cost of coal sales in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, while the interest portion has been reflected as
interest expense.
Expenses resulting from early debt extinguishment and termination of hedge accounting for interest
rate swaps
On June 25, 2003, we repaid the $675 million term loan of our Arch Western subsidiary with the
proceeds from the offering of $700 million in senior notes. Prior to the repayment, we had
designated certain interest rate swaps as hedges of the variable rate interest payments due under
the Arch Western term loans. Pursuant to the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 133),
historical mark-to-market adjustments related to these swaps through June 25, 2003 were deferred as
a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. Subsequent to the repayment of the term loans,
these deferred amounts will be amortized as additional expense over the contractual terms of the
swap agreements. For the three months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, we recognized $2.1 million of
expense for both periods related to the amortization of previously deferred mark-to-market
adjustments. For the six months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, we recognized $4.1 million of
expense for both periods related to the amortization of previously deferred mark-to-market
adjustments.
Quarter Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2004
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per ton data) |
Coal sales |
|
$ |
633,797 |
|
|
$ |
422,778 |
|
|
$ |
211,019 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
% |
Tons sold |
|
|
34,630 |
|
|
|
26,424 |
|
|
|
8,206 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
% |
Coal sales realization per ton sold |
|
$ |
18.30 |
|
|
$ |
16.00 |
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
Tons sold by operating segment
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons Sold |
|
% of Total |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Powder River Basin |
|
|
21,995 |
|
|
|
17,643 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
% |
|
|
66.8 |
% |
Central Appalachia |
|
|
7,957 |
|
|
|
7,334 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
Western Bituminous Region |
|
|
4,678 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating regions |
|
|
34,630 |
|
|
|
26,424 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales. The increase in coal sales resulted from the combination of higher pricing, increased
volumes and the acquisitions of Triton in the Powder River Basin and the remaining 35% interest in
Canyon Fuel in the Western Bituminous region, both of which occurred during the third quarter of
2004.
Volumes increased dramatically in the Powder River Basin (an increase of 24.7%) and at our Western
Bituminous operations (an increase of 223.3%), in addition to an 8.5% increase in volumes in
Central Appalachia. Volumes in both the Powder River Basin and the Western Bituminous region
benefited from the acquisitions that were completed in the third quarter of 2004. Volumes in
Central Appalachia were higher primarily from increased brokered activity.
Per ton realizations increased due primarily to higher contract prices in all three regions. In the
Powder River Basin, per ton realization increased 17.1%, as a result of increased base pricing and
higher SO2 quality premiums resulting from higher SO2 emission allowance prices. The Central
Appalachia Basin experienced an increase of 16.9%, as both contract and spot market prices were
higher than in the second quarter of 2004. Additionally, we received higher sales prices on our
metallurgical coal sales in the second quarter of 2005 as compared to the second quarter of 2004.
The Western Bituminous regions per ton realization increased 32.9%. In addition to higher contract
pricing, per ton realizations in the Western Bituminous region were also affected by the acquisition
of the remaining 35% interest in Canyon Fuel during the third quarter of 2004.
On a consolidated basis, the increase in per ton realizations was partially offset by the change in
mix of sales volumes among our operating regions. As reflected in the table above, Central
Appalachia volumes (which have the highest average realization) increased slightly while volumes
from lower realization regions (the Powder River Basin and Western Bituminous Region) increased
dramatically from the prior years comparable quarter.
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Cost of coal sales |
|
$ |
542,073 |
|
|
$ |
364,083 |
|
|
$ |
177,990 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
52,142 |
|
|
|
36,080 |
|
|
|
16,062 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
17,979 |
|
|
|
11,717 |
|
|
|
6,262 |
|
|
|
53.4 |
% |
Other expenses |
|
|
12,498 |
|
|
|
6,853 |
|
|
|
5,645 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
624,692 |
|
|
$ |
418,733 |
|
|
$ |
205,959 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales. The increase in cost of coal sales is primarily due to the acquisitions of
Triton in the Powder River Basin and the remaining 35% interest in Canyon Fuel in the Western
Bituminous region, both of which occurred during the third quarter of 2004, along with the increase
in sales sensitive costs resulting from the previously discussed increase in revenues. Specific
factors contributing to the increase are as follows (note that specifically the increases discussed
below for diesel fuel, explosives, utilities, operating supplies and repairs and maintenance costs
are partially due to the acquisitions of Triton and Canyon Fuel during the third quarter of 2004):
|
|
|
Production taxes and coal royalties (which are incurred as a percentage of coal sales
realization) increased $32.4 million during the second quarter of 2005 compared to the same
period in the prior year. |
|
|
|
|
Our Central Appalachia operations incurred higher costs related to additional
processing necessary for coal sold in metallurgical markets as well as the difficult
geologic conditions adversely affecting our Mingo Logan mine during the second quarter of
2005. |
|
|
|
|
The cost of purchased coal increased $49.9 million, reflecting a combination of
increased purchase volumes and higher spot market prices that were prevalent during the
second quarter of 2005 compared to the same |
19
|
|
|
period in 2004. During the second quarter of 2005, we utilized purchased coal to fulfill
steam coal sales commitments in order to direct more of our produced coal into the
metallurgical markets. |
|
|
|
|
Repairs and maintenance costs increased $17.7 million compared to the same period in
the prior year. |
|
|
|
|
Costs for diesel fuel, explosives and utilities increased $8.3 million, $3.8 million
and $2.3 million, respectively, compared to the same period in the prior year. |
|
|
|
|
Costs for operating supplies increased $11.0 million due partially to increased steel
prices during the current quarter compared to the prior years comparable quarter. |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. The increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization
is due primarily to the property additions resulting from the acquisitions made during the third
quarter of 2004.
Regional Analysis:
Our operating costs (reflected below on a per-ton basis) are defined as including all mining costs,
which consist of all amounts classified as cost of coal sales (except pass-through transportation
costs and sales contract amortization) and all depreciation, depletion and amortization
attributable to mining operations.
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Powder River Basin |
|
$ |
7.38 |
|
|
$ |
6.07 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
Central Appalachia |
|
$ |
42.54 |
|
|
$ |
35.17 |
|
|
$ |
7.37 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
% |
Western Bituminous Region |
|
$ |
14.21 |
|
|
$ |
15.82 |
|
|
$ |
(1.61 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
)% |
Powder River Basin On a per-ton basis, operating costs increased in the Powder River Basin
primarily due to higher diesel fuel costs ($0.12 per ton), higher repairs and maintenance costs
($0.20 per ton) and increased production taxes (including the $2.6 million severance tax accrual
discussed above) and coal royalties ($0.45 per ton). Additionally, average costs were higher due to
the integration of the acquired North Rochelle mine into
our Black Thunder mine in the third quarter of 2004.
Central Appalachia Operating cost per ton increased due to increased costs for coal purchases
($5.38 per ton), increased costs for operating supplies ($0.20 per ton), increased diesel fuel
($0.44 per ton) and production taxes and coal royalties ($0.41 per ton) as well as the increased
preparation costs for metallurgical coal discussed above. Additionally, the performance of our
Mingo Logan mine has been adversely affected by difficult geological conditions, resulting in
higher costs associated with these challenges.
Western Bituminous Region Operating cost per ton decreased primarily due to increased production
activity as a result of the acquisition of the remaining 35% of Canyon Fuel during the third
quarter of 2004. Canyon Fuels mines in the aggregate have a lower operating cost per ton than the
West Elk Mine.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased during the current quarter due primarily to increased legal and professional fees and
higher expenses resulting from amounts expected to be earned under our annual incentive plans.
Other Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Income from equity investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
(5,995 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Gain on sale of units of NRP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Other operating income |
|
|
12,388 |
|
|
|
14,513 |
|
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
(14.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,388 |
|
|
$ |
20,825 |
|
|
$ |
(8,437 |
) |
|
|
(40.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income. The decrease in other operating income is primarily due to the elimination
of administrative fees from Canyon Fuel subsequent to our acquisition of the remaining 35% interest
of this entity during the third quarter of 2004. These decreases were partially offset by the
previously discussed settlement from an insurance broker resulting in a gain of $1.0 million and
the gain on the sale of the facility of which $1.2 million was recorded in this quarter in other
operating income.
Interest Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(19,389 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,101 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,288 |
) |
|
|
(37.5 |
)% |
Interest income |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
86.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(17,708 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,198 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,510 |
) |
|
|
(34.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense. The increase in interest expense results from a higher amount of average
borrowings during the second quarter of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. In addition,
we recognized $1.4 million of interest expense associated with the severance tax assessed by the
State of Wyoming described above during the second quarter of 2005.
Interest Income. The increase in interest income results primarily from interest on short-term
investments.
21
Other Non-operating Income and Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Expenses resulting
from early debt
extinguishment and
termination of hedge
accounting for interest
rate swaps |
|
$ |
(2,066 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,066 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Other non-operating income |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
125.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,611 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,864 |
) |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts reported as non-operating consist of income or expense resulting from the Companys
financing activities other than interest. As described above, the Companys results of operations
for the quarters ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include expenses of $2.1 million for both periods,
related to the termination of hedge accounting and resulting amortization of amounts that had
previously been deferred.
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys effective tax rate is sensitive to changes in estimates of annual profitability and
percentage depletion.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per ton data) |
Coal sales |
|
$ |
1,234,262 |
|
|
$ |
826,268 |
|
|
$ |
407,994 |
|
|
|
49.4 |
% |
Tons sold |
|
|
71,657 |
|
|
|
52,269 |
|
|
|
19,388 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
% |
Coal sales realization per ton sold |
|
$ |
17.22 |
|
|
$ |
15.81 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
Tons sold by operating segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons Sold |
|
% of Total |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Powder River Basin |
|
|
47,046 |
|
|
|
34,223 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
% |
|
|
65.5 |
% |
Central Appalachia |
|
|
15,134 |
|
|
|
14,855 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
Western Bituminous Region |
|
|
9,477 |
|
|
|
3,191 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating regions |
|
|
71,657 |
|
|
|
52,269 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales. The increase in coal sales resulted from the combination of higher pricing, increased
volumes and the acquisitions of Triton in the Powder River Basin and the remaining 35% interest in
Canyon Fuel in the Western Bituminous region, both of which occurred during the third quarter of
2004.
Volumes increased dramatically during the first half of the year in 2005 compared to the same
period in 2004 in the Powder River Basin (an increase of 37.5%) and at our Western Bituminous
operations (an increase of 197.0%). Volumes in Central Appalachia increased by 1.9% compared to the
same period in the prior year. Volumes in both the Powder River Basin and the Western Bituminous
region benefited from the acquisitions that were completed in the third quarter of 2004.
Per ton realizations increased due primarily to higher contract prices in all three regions. In the
Powder River Basin, per ton realization increased 13.6%, as a result of increased base pricing and
above-market pricing on certain contracts acquired in the Triton acquisition as well as higher SO2
quality premiums resulting from higher SO2
22
emission allowance prices. The Central Appalachia Basin experienced an increase of 21.3%, as
both contract and spot market prices were higher than in the first half of 2004. Additionally, we
received higher sales prices on our metallurgical coal sales in the first half of 2005 as compared
to the first half of 2004. The Western Bituminous regions per ton realization increased 26.3%. In
addition to higher contract pricing, per ton realizations in the Western Bituminous Basin were also
affected by the acquisition of the remaining 35% interest in Canyon Fuel during the third quarter
of 2004.
On a consolidated basis, the increase in per ton realizations was partially offset by the change in
mix of sales volumes among our operating regions. As reflected in the table above, Central
Appalachia volumes (which have the highest average realization) increased slightly in the first
half of 2005 while volumes from lower realization regions (the Powder River Basin and Western
Bituminous Region) increased substantially from the prior years comparable period.
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Cost of coal sales |
|
$ |
1,061,714 |
|
|
$ |
712,621 |
|
|
$ |
349,093 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
103,045 |
|
|
|
72,185 |
|
|
|
30,860 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
40,255 |
|
|
|
26,630 |
|
|
|
13,625 |
|
|
|
51.2 |
% |
Other expenses |
|
|
25,545 |
|
|
|
12,497 |
|
|
|
13,048 |
|
|
|
104.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,230,559 |
|
|
$ |
823,933 |
|
|
$ |
406,626 |
|
|
|
49.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales. The increase in cost of coal sales is primarily due to the acquisitions of
Triton in the Powder River Basin and the remaining 35% interest in Canyon Fuel in the Western
bituminous region, both of which occurred during the third quarter of 2004, along with the increase
in sales sensitive costs resulting from the previously discussed increase in revenues. Specific
factors contributing to the increase are as follows (note that specifically the increases discussed
below for diesel fuel, explosives, utilities, operating supplies and repairs and maintenance costs
are partially due to the acquisitions of Triton and Canyon Fuel during the third quarter of 2004):
|
|
|
Production taxes and coal royalties (which are incurred as a percentage of coal sales
realization) increased $61.7 million during the first half of 2005 compared to the first
half of 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Our Central Appalachia operations incurred higher costs related to additional
processing necessary for coal sold in metallurgical markets as well as the difficult
geological conditions adversely affecting our Mingo Logan mine during the first half of
2005. |
|
|
|
|
The cost of purchased coal increased $88.2 million, reflecting a combination of
increased purchase volumes and higher spot market prices that were prevalent during the
first half of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. During the first half of 2005, we
utilized purchased coal to fulfill steam coal sales commitments in order to direct more of
our produced coal into the metallurgical markets. |
|
|
|
|
Repairs and maintenance costs increased $32.1 million compared to the same period in
the prior year. |
|
|
|
|
Costs for diesel fuel, explosives and utilities increased $17.9 million, $6.1 million
and $5.1 million, respectively, compared to the same period in the prior year. |
|
|
|
|
Costs for operating supplies increased $24.2 million due partially to increased steel
prices during the first half of 2005 compared to the same period in the prior year. |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. The increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization
is due primarily to the property additions resulting from the acquisitions made during the third
quarter of 2004.
Regional Analysis:
23
Our operating costs (reflected below on a per-ton basis) are
defined as including all mining costs, which consist of all amounts classified as cost of coal
sales (except pass-through transportation costs and sales contract
amortization) and all depreciation, depletion and amortization
attributable to mining operations.
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
Powder River Basin |
|
$ |
6.93 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
Central Appalachia |
|
$ |
42.48 |
|
|
$ |
33.56 |
|
|
$ |
8.92 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
Western Bituminous Region |
|
$ |
14.71 |
|
|
$ |
16.38 |
|
|
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
)% |
Powder River Basin On a per-ton basis, operating costs increased in the Powder River Basin
primarily due to increased cost of purchased coal ($0.16 per ton), higher diesel fuel costs ($0.13
per ton), higher repairs and maintenance costs ($0.15 per ton) and increased production taxes
(including the $2.6 million severance tax accrual discussed above) and coal royalties ($0.23 per
ton). Additionally, average costs were higher due to the integration of the acquired North Rochelle
mine into our Black Thunder mine in the third quarter of
2004.
Central Appalachia Operating cost per ton increased due to increased costs for coal purchases
($5.06 per ton), increased costs for operating supplies ($0.45 per ton), increased diesel fuel
($0.53 per ton) and production taxes and coal royalties ($0.54 per ton) as well as the increased
preparation costs for metallurgical coal discussed above. Additionally, the performance of our
Mingo Logan mine has been adversely affected by difficult geological conditions, resulting in
higher costs associated with these challenges.
Western Bituminous Region Operating cost per ton decreased primarily due to increased production
activity as a result of the acquisition of the remaining 35% of Canyon Fuel during the third
quarter of 2004. Canyon Fuels mines in the aggregate have a lower operating cost per ton than the
West Elk Mine.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
increased during the period due primarily to $9.5 million of
expense that was recognized in
the first quarter of 2005 for the performance-contingent phantom stock award that was paid to
certain employees in March 2005. In addition, costs increased during the first half of 2005 due
primarily to increased legal and professional fees and higher expenses resulting from amounts
expected to be earned under our annual incentive plans.
Other Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Income from equity investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,685 |
|
|
$ |
(9,685 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Gain on sale of units of NRP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,955 |
|
|
|
(89,955 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Other operating income |
|
|
43,743 |
|
|
|
29,804 |
|
|
|
13,939 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43,743 |
|
|
$ |
129,444 |
|
|
$ |
(85,701 |
) |
|
|
(66.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating income. The increase in other operating income is primarily due to a $9.3 million
gain resulting from land sales, a gain on the sale of a facility of which $1.2 million was recorded
in other operating income, a $9.5 million gain resulting from various equipment sales and the
settlement from an insurance broker resulting in a gain of $1.0 million during the first half of
2005. This was partially offset by the elimination of administrative fees from Canyon Fuel
subsequent to our acquisition of the remaining 35% interest during the third quarter of 2004 and
reduced book-out income of $1.5 million compared to the comparable period in the prior year.
Interest Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(37,460 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,842 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,618 |
) |
|
|
(29.9 |
)% |
Interest income |
|
|
3,526 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
118.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(33,934 |
) |
|
$ |
(27,229 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,705 |
) |
|
|
(24.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense. The increase in interest expense results from a higher amount of average
borrowings in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. In addition, we
recognized $1.4 million of interest expense associated with the severance tax assessed by the State
of Wyoming described above during the first half of 2005.
25
Interest Income. The increase in interest income results primarily from interest on short-term
investments.
26
Other Non-operating Income and Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Expenses resulting
from early debt
extinguishment and
termination of hedge
accounting for interest
rate swaps |
|
$ |
(4,133 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,132 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
(81.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,063 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,759 |
) |
|
$ |
(304 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts reported as non-operating consist of income or expense resulting from the Companys
financing activities other than interest. As described above, the Companys results of operations
for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include expenses of $4.1 million for both periods
related to the termination of hedge accounting and resulting amortization of amounts that had
previously been deferred.
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
(600 |
) |
|
$ |
19,700 |
|
|
$ |
(20,300 |
) |
|
|
(103.0 |
)% |
The Companys effective tax rate is sensitive to changes in estimates of annual profitability and
percentage depletion. The decrease in the income tax provision in the first half of 2005 as
compared to that recorded in the first half of 2004 is primarily the result of not having the
taxable income from the sale of the NRP units as we had in the first quarter of 2004.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of June 30, 2005. Based on that evaluation, our management, including
the CEO and CFO, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such
date. There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
OUTLOOK
Railroad Transportation Disruptions. During 2004 and again in the first half of 2005, rail service
disruptions resulted in missed shipments in all of our operating regions. In the second quarter of
2005, the rail disruptions were most pronounced in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming, where
shipments from our Black Thunder mine were reduced by a total of 3.8 million tons and production
was curtailed by approximately two million tons. In total, poor rail performance reduced our
financial results by an estimated $0.35 per share for the quarter.
The major maintenance repair work currently underway on the joint line rail system in the Powder
River Basin is expected to negatively impact shipments from the
region through the end of 2005. We expect gradual improvement in rail
service in other regions as well.
Mingo Logan Operations. During the latter part of 2004 and the first half of 2005, our Mingo Logan
mine in West Virginia was adversely affected by a combination of difficult geologic conditions in
its previous longwall panel, a major longwall move and a slow startup of the new longwall panel
after the move. The start-up process was impaired principally by a greater-than-expected influx of
water, which in turn resulted in a series of equipment-related difficulties at the mine. These
issues reduced operating income at the Mingo Logan mine by $25.0 million during the first two
quarters of 2005 compared to anticipated results. These operational challenges have been addressed
and we expect the mines recent improved performance to continue over the remainder of 2005.
27
Expenses Related to Interest Rate Swaps. We had designated certain interest rate swaps as hedges of
the variable rate interest payments due under Arch Westerns term loans. Pursuant to the
requirements of FAS 133, historical mark-to-market adjustments related to these swaps through June
25, 2003 of $27.0 million were deferred as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.
Subsequent to the repayment of the term loans, these deferred amounts
will be amortized as additional expense over the original contractual terms of the swap agreements.
As of December 31, 2004, the remaining deferred amounts will be recognized as expense in the
following periods: $7.7 million in 2005 ($4.1 million was recognized in the first half of 2005);
$4.8 million in 2006; and $1.9 million in 2007.
Chief Objectives. We are focused on taking steps to increase shareholder returns by improving
earnings, reducing costs, strengthening cash generation, and improving productivity at our
large-scale mines, while building on our strategic position in each of the nations three principal
low-sulfur coal basins. We believe that success in the coal industry is largely dependent on
leadership in three crucial areas of performance safety, environmental stewardship and return on
investment and we are pursuing such leadership aggressively. We are also seeking to enhance our
position as a preferred supplier to U.S. power producers by acting as a reliable and highly ethical
partner. We plan to focus on organic growth by continuing to develop our existing reserve base,
which is large and highly strategic. We also plan to evaluate acquisitions that represent a good
fit with our existing operations.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The following is a summary of cash provided by or used in each of the indicated types of activities
during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
94,261 |
|
|
$ |
19,982 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(141,921 |
) |
|
|
14,580 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
(16,125 |
) |
|
|
7,197 |
|
Cash provided by operating activities increased in the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared
to the same period in 2004 primarily as a result of improved performance at our operations in
addition to a decreased investment in working capital. While trade accounts receivable
represented the largest use of funds, increasing by more than $45 million in the first half of 2005
compared to an increase of $40 million in the first half of 2004, it was offset by an increase in
accounts payable and accrued expenses of more than $22 million in the first half of 2005 compared
to a relatively flat change in the prior years comparable period. In addition, we received $14.7
million during the second quarter of 2005 related to payment of receivables for settled audit years
from the Internal Revenue Service.
Cash used in investing activities in the first half of 2005 reflects capital expenditures and
advance royalty payments of $139.4 million and $23.0 million, respectively, offset partially by
proceeds from the sales of land and equipment of $20.4 million. Cash provided by investing
activities in the first half of 2004 reflects proceeds of $105.4 million from the sale of NRP
units. Capital expenditures and advance royalty payments were $69.1 million and $22.7 million,
respectively.
Capital expenditures are made to improve and replace existing mining equipment, expand existing
mines, develop new mines and improve the overall efficiency of mining operations. We estimate that
our capital expenditures will range from $400 to $420 million in total for 2005. This estimate
includes capital expenditures related to development work at certain of our mining operations,
including the Mountain Laurel complex in West Virginia and the North Lease mine at the Skyline
complex in Utah. Also, this estimate assumes no other acquisitions, significant expansions of our
existing mining operations or additions to our reserve base. We anticipate that we will fund these
capital expenditures with available cash, existing credit facilities and cash generated from
operations.
Cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2005 consists primarily of
net payments on our revolving credit facility of $25.0 million, net payments on our long-term debt
of $6.4 million and dividend payments of $13.7 million, offset partially by $31.3 million in
proceeds from the issuance of common stock under
28
our employee stock incentive plan. Cash provided
by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2004 consists primarily of $25.7
million in proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our employee stock incentive plan,
offset by payments on long-term debt of $6.3 million and dividend payments of $11.1 million.
On October 28, 2004, we completed a public offering of 7,187,500 shares of our common stock,
including the underwriters full over-allotment option, at a price of $33.85 per share. We used the
net proceeds of the offering, totaling $230.5 million after the underwriters discount and
expenses, to repay borrowings under our revolving credit facility incurred to finance our
acquisition of Triton Coal Company and the first annual payment for the Little Thunder federal coal
lease. We intend to use the remaining proceeds for general corporate purposes, including the
development of the Mountain Laurel longwall mine in Central Appalachia.
On October 22, 2004, two subsidiaries of Arch Western, as co-obligors, issued $250 million of
6-3/4% senior notes due 2013 at a price of 104.75% of par, pursuant to Rule 144A under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The notes form a single series with Arch Western Finances
existing $700 million, 6-3/4% senior notes due 2013. The net proceeds of the offering were used to
repay and retire the outstanding indebtedness under Arch Westerns $100.0 million term loan
maturing in 2007, to repay indebtedness under our revolving credit facility and for general
corporate purposes.
Excluding any significant mineral reserve acquisitions, we generally satisfy our working capital
requirements and fund capital expenditures and debt-service obligations with cash generated from
operations. We believe that cash generated from operations and our borrowing capacity will be
sufficient to meet working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures and scheduled
debt payments for at least the next several years. Our ability to satisfy debt service obligations,
to fund planned capital expenditures, to make acquisitions and to pay dividends will depend upon
our future operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in the
coal industry and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control.
On December 22, 2004, we entered into a $700.0 million revolving credit facility that matures on
December 22, 2009. The rate of interest on borrowings under the credit facility is a floating rate
based on LIBOR. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of our assets as well as our
ownership interests in substantially all of our subsidiaries, except our ownership interests in
Arch Western and its subsidiaries. The credit facility replaced our existing $350.0 million
revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2005, we had $103.5 million in letters of credit
outstanding, resulting in $596.5 million of unused borrowings under the revolver. At June 30, 2005,
financial covenant requirements do not restrict the amount of unused capacity available to us for
borrowing and letters of credit.
Financial covenants contained in our revolving credit facility consist of a maximum leverage ratio,
a maximum senior secured leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. The leverage ratio
requires that we not permit the ratio of total net debt (as defined in the facility) at the end of
any calendar quarter to EBITDA (as defined in the facility) for the four quarters then ended to
exceed a specified amount. The interest coverage ratio requires that we not permit the ratio of
EBITDA (as defined) at the end of any calendar quarter to interest expense for the four quarters
then ended to be less than a specified amount. The senior secured leverage ratio requires that we
not permit the ratio of total net senior secured debt (as defined) at the end of any calendar
quarter to EBITDA (as defined) for the four quarters then ended to exceed a specified amount. We
were in compliance with all financial covenants at June 30, 2005.
We periodically establish uncommitted lines of credit with banks. These agreements generally
provide for short-term borrowings at market rates. At June 30, 2005, there were $20.0 million of
such agreements in effect, of which none were outstanding.
We are exposed to market risk associated with interest rates due to our existing level of
indebtedness. At June 30, 2005, substantially all of our outstanding debt bore interest at fixed
rates.
Additionally, we are exposed to market risk associated with interest rates resulting from our
interest rate swap positions. Prior to the June 25, 2003 Arch Western Finance senior notes offering
and subsequent repayment of Arch Westerns term loans, we utilized interest rate swap agreements to
convert the variable-rate interest payments due under the term loans and our revolving credit
facility to fixed-rate payments.
At June 30, 2005, our net interest rate swap position is as follows:
29
|
|
|
Swaps with a notional value of $25.0 million, which are designated as hedges of future
interest payments to be made under our revolving credit facility. Under these swaps, we pay
a fixed rate of 5.96% (before the credit spread over LIBOR) and receive a variable rate
based upon 30-day LIBOR. The remaining term of the swap agreements at June 30, 2005 was 24
months. |
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2005, though, the revolving credit facility was paid down leaving
the underlying interest rate swap ineffective. As such, this position was terminated in July
2005 for a payment of $0.9 million. The ineffectiveness for the quarter and six months ending
June 30, 2005 amounted to $0.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively, and is recorded in
other non operating expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
|
|
|
|
Swaps with a total notional value of $500.0 million consisting of offsetting positions
of $250.0 million each. Because of the offsetting nature of these positions, we are not
exposed to significant market interest rate risk related to these swaps. Under these swaps,
we pay a weighted average fixed rate 5.72% on $250.0 million of notional value and receive
a weighted average fixed rate of 2.71% on $250.0 million of notional value. The remaining
terms of these swap agreements at June 30, 2005 ranged from 2 to 25 months. |
As of June 30, 2005, the fair value of our net interest rate swap position was a liability of $7.1
million. This liability is included in other noncurrent liabilities in the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We are exposed to price risk related to the value of SO2 emission allowances that are a component
of the quality adjustment provisions in many of our coal supply contracts. We recently entered into
several put option and swap contracts to reduce volatility in the price of SO2 emission allowances.
These contracts serve to protect us from any possible downturn in the price of SO2 emission
allowances. The put option agreements grant us the right to sell a certain quantity of SO2 emission
allowances at a specified price on a specified date. The swap agreements essentially fix the price
we receive for SO2 emission allowances by allowing us to receive a fixed SO2 allowance price and
pay a floating SO2 allowance price.
We are also exposed to commodity price risk related to our purchase of diesel fuel. We enter into
forward purchase contracts and heating oil swaps to reduce volatility in the price of diesel fuel
for our operations. The swap agreements essentially fix the price paid for diesel fuel by requiring
us to pay a fixed heating oil price and receive a floating heating oil price. The changes in the
floating heating oil price highly correlate to changes in diesel fuel prices.
The discussion below presents the sensitivity of the market value of our financial instruments to
selected changes in market rates and prices. The range of changes reflects our view of changes that
are reasonably possible over a one-year period. Market values are the present value of projected
future cash flows based on the market rates and prices chosen. The major accounting policies for
these instruments are described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed on our Annual Report on Form 10-K with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
At June 30, 2005, our debt portfolio primarily consisted of fixed rate debt. A change in interest
rates on our fixed rate debt impacts our net financial instrument position but has no impact on
interest incurred or cash flows. The sensitivity analysis related to our fixed rate debt assumes an
instantaneous 100-basis point move in interest rates from their levels at June 30, 2005, with all
other variables held constant. A 100-basis point increase in market interest rates would result in
a $55.9 million decrease in the fair value of our fixed rate debt at June 30, 2005.
With respect to our SO2 emission allowance put option and swap positions, as well as our heating
oil swap positions, a change in price of the underlying products impacts our net financial
instrument position. At June 30, 2005, a $50 decrease in the price of SO2 emission allowances would
result in a $1.5 million increase in the fair value of the financial position of our SO2 emission
allowance put option and swap agreements. At June 30, 2005, a $.05 per gallon increase in the price
of heating oil would result in a $1.0 million increase in the fair value of the financial position
of our heating oil swap agreements.
With respect to our interest rate swap positions noted above, a change in interest rates impacts
our net financial instrument position. A 100-basis point increase in market interest rates would
result in a $0.7 million decrease in the fair value of our liability under our interest rate swap
positions at June 30, 2005.
30
CONTINGENCIES
Reclamation
The federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA) and similar state statutes
require that mine property be restored in accordance with specified standards and an approved
reclamation plan. We accrue for the costs of reclamation in accordance with the provisions of FAS
143, which was adopted as of January 1, 2003. These costs relate to reclaiming the pit and support
acreage at surface mines and sealing portals at deep mines. Other costs of reclamation common to
surface and underground mining are related to reclaiming refuse and slurry ponds, eliminating
sedimentation and drainage control structures, and dismantling or demolishing equipment or
buildings used in mining operations. The establishment of the asset retirement obligation liability
is based upon permit requirements and requires various estimates and assumptions, principally
associated with costs and productivities.
We review our entire environmental liability periodically and make necessary adjustments, including
permit changes and revisions to costs and productivities to reflect current experience. Our
management believes it is making adequate provisions for all expected reclamation and other
associated costs.
Legal Contingencies
Permit Litigation Matters. A group of local and national environmental organizations filed suit
against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the U.S. District Court in Huntington, West Virginia on
October 23, 2003. In its
complaint, Ohio River Valley Environmental Coalition, et al v. Bulen, et al, the plaintiffs allege
that the Corps has violated its statutory duties arising under the Clean Water Act, the
Administrative Procedure Act and the National Environmental Policy Act in issuing the Nationwide 21
(NWP 21) general permit. The plaintiffs allege that the procedural requirements of the three
federal statutes identified in their complaint have been violated, and that the Corps may not
utilize the mechanism of a nationwide permit to authorize valley fills. Among specific fills
identified in the complaint as not meeting the requirements of the NWP 21 are valley fills
associated with several of our operating subsidiaries, although none are party to this litigation.
If the plaintiffs prevail in this litigation, it may delay our receipt of these permits.
On July 8, 2004, the District court entered a final order enjoining the Corps from authorizing new
valley fills using the mechanism of its nationwide permit. The Court also ordered the Corps to
suspend current authorizations issued for fills that had not yet commenced construction on the date
of the order. The district court modified its earlier decision on August 13 when it directed the
Corps to suspend all permits for fills that had not commenced construction as of July 8, 2004.
Three permits issued at two of the Companys operating subsidiaries were affected by the Courts
July 8 order. Although the two operating subsidiaries were prohibited from constructing the fills
previously authorized, the Courts order does allow them to permit the fill construction using the
mechanism of an individual section 404 Clean Water Act permit. We do not believe that obtaining an
individual permit will adversely impact either of the operating subsidiaries.
The Corps and several intervening trade associations, of which we are a member of three, filed an
appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in this matter on September 16, 2004.
The matter has been briefed, and the Fourth Circuit has indicated that the case will likely be
argued in September 2005.
West Virginia Flooding Litigation. We and three of our subsidiaries have been named, among others,
in nineteen separate complaints filed and served in Wyoming, McDowell, Fayette, Kanawha, Raleigh,
Boone and Mercer Counties, West Virginia. These cases collectively include approximately 2,100
plaintiffs who are seeking to recover from more than 160 defendants for property damage and
personal injuries arising out of flooding that occurred in southern West Virginia on or about July
8, 2001. The plaintiffs have sued coal, timber, oil and gas, and land companies under the theory
that mining, construction of haul roads and removal of timber caused natural surface waters to be
diverted in an unnatural way, thereby causing damage to the plaintiffs. The West Virginia Supreme
Court has ruled that these cases, along with thirty-seven other flood damages cases not involving
our subsidiaries, be handled pursuant to the Courts Mass Litigation rules. As a result of this
ruling, the cases have been transferred to the Circuit Court of Raleigh County in West Virginia to
be handled by a panel consisting of three circuit court judges,
31
which certified certain legal
issues back to the West Virginia Supreme Court. The West Virginia Supreme Court responded to the
questions certified, and discovery is underway.
While the outcome of this litigation is subject to uncertainties, based on our preliminary
evaluation of the issues and the potential impact on us, we believe this matter will be resolved
without a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Ark Land Company v. Crown Industries. In response to a declaratory judgment action filed by Ark
Land Company, a subsidiary of ours, in Mingo County, West Virginia against Crown Industries
involving the interpretation of a severance deed under which Ark Land controls the coal and mining
rights on property in Mingo County, West Virginia, Crown Industries filed a counterclaim against
Ark Land and a third party complaint against us and two of our other subsidiaries seeking damages
for trespass, nuisance and property damage arising out of the exercise of rights under the
severance deed on the property by our subsidiaries. The defendant has alleged that our subsidiaries
have insufficient rights to haul certain foreign coals across the property without payment of
certain wheelage or other fees to the defendant. In addition, the defendant has alleged that we and
our subsidiaries have violated West Virginias Standards for Management of Waste Oil and the West
Virginia Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Act by spilling and disposing of hydrocarbon and other
wastes on and in the property and by failing to return the property to its approximate original
contour. It also alleges that we or our contractor have improperly disposed of explosive
components. This case is tentatively set for trial in August 2005.
While the outcome of this litigation is subject to uncertainties, based on our evaluation of the
issues and the potential impact on it, we believe this matter will be resolved without a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
We are a party to numerous other claims and lawsuits with respect to various matters. We provide
for costs related to contingencies, including environmental matters, when a loss is probable and
the amount is reasonably determinable. After conferring with counsel, it is the opinion of
management that the ultimate resolution of these claims, to the extent not previously provided for,
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity.
Certain Trends and Uncertainties
Substantial Leverage Covenants
As of June 30, 2005, we had outstanding consolidated indebtedness of $979.1 million, representing
approximately 47% of our capital employed. Despite making substantial progress in reducing debt, we
continue to have significant debt service obligations, and the terms of our credit agreements limit
our flexibility and result in a number of limitations on us. We also have significant lease and
royalty obligations. Our ability to satisfy debt service, lease and royalty obligations and to
effect any refinancing of our indebtedness will depend upon future operating performance, which
will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in the markets that we serve as well as
financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We may be unable to
generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings, or other financings may be
unavailable in an amount sufficient to enable us to fund our debt service, lease and royalty
payment obligations or our other liquidity needs.
Our relative amount of debt and the terms of our credit agreements could have material consequences
to our business, including, but not limited to: (i) making it more difficult to satisfy debt
covenants and debt service, lease payment and other obligations; (ii) making it more difficult to
pay quarterly dividends as we have in the past; (iii) increasing our vulnerability to general
adverse economic and industry conditions; (iv) limiting our ability to obtain additional financing
to fund future acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate
requirements; (v) reducing the availability of cash flows from operations to fund acquisitions,
working capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate purposes; (vi) limiting our
flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we
compete; or (vii) placing us at a competitive disadvantage when compared to competitors with less
relative amounts of debt.
The agreements governing our outstanding debt impose a number of restrictions on us. For example,
the terms of our credit facilities and leases contain financial and other covenants that create
limitations on our ability to, among other things, borrow the full amount under our credit
facilities, effect acquisitions or dispositions and incur additional debt, and require us to, among
other things, maintain various financial ratios and comply with various other financial
32
covenants.
Our ability to comply with these restrictions may be affected by events beyond our control and, as
a result, we may be unable to comply with these restrictions. A failure to comply with these
restrictions could adversely affect our ability to borrow under our credit facilities or result in
an event of default under these agreements. In the event of a default, our lenders could terminate
their commitments to us and declare all amounts borrowed, together with accrued interest and fees,
immediately due and payable. If this were to occur, we might not be able to pay these amounts, or
we might be forced to seek an amendment to our debt agreements which could make the terms of these
agreements more onerous for us.
Any material downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely affect our ability to borrow and
result in more restrictive borrowing terms, including increased borrowing costs, more restrictive
covenants and the extension of less open credit. This in turn could affect our internal cost of
capital estimates and therefore operational decisions.
Profitability
Our mining operations are inherently subject to changing conditions that can affect levels of
production and production costs at particular mines for varying lengths of time and can result in
decreases in our profitability. We are exposed to commodity price risk related to our purchase of
diesel fuel, explosives and steel. In addition, weather conditions, equipment replacement or
repair, fires, variations in thickness of the layer, or seam, of coal, amounts of overburden, rock
and other natural materials and other geological conditions have had, and can be expected in the
future to have, a significant impact on our operating results. Prolonged disruption of production
at any of our principal mines, particularly our Black Thunder mine, would result in a decrease in
our revenues and profitability, which could be material. Other factors affecting the production and
sale of our coal that could result in decreases in our profitability include:
|
|
|
continued high pricing environment for our raw materials, including, among other
things, diesel fuel, explosives and steel; |
|
|
|
|
expiration or termination of, or sales price redeterminations or suspension of
deliveries under, coal supply agreements; |
|
|
|
|
disruption or increases in the cost of transportation services; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws or regulations, including permitting requirements; |
|
|
|
|
litigation; |
|
|
|
|
work stoppages or other labor difficulties; |
|
|
|
|
labor shortages; |
|
|
|
|
mine worker vacation schedules and related maintenance activities; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in coal market and general economic conditions. |
Environmental and Regulatory Factors
The coal mining industry is subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities on
matters such as:
|
|
|
the discharge of materials into the environment; |
|
|
|
|
employee health and safety; |
|
|
|
|
mine permits and other licensing requirements; |
|
|
|
|
reclamation and restoration of mining properties after mining is completed; |
|
|
|
|
management of materials generated by mining operations; |
33
|
|
|
surface subsidence from underground mining; |
|
|
|
|
water pollution; |
|
|
|
|
legislatively mandated benefits for current and retired coal miners; |
|
|
|
|
air quality standards; |
|
|
|
|
protection of wetlands; |
|
|
|
|
endangered plant and wildlife protection; |
|
|
|
|
limitations on land use; |
|
|
|
|
storage of petroleum products and substances that are regarded as hazardous under applicable laws; and |
|
|
|
|
management of electrical equipment containing polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs. |
In addition, the electric generating industry, which is the most significant end-user of coal, is
subject to extensive regulation regarding the environmental impact of its power generation
activities, which could affect demand for our coal. The possibility exists that new legislation or
regulations may be adopted or that the enforcement of existing laws could become more stringent,
either of which may have a significant impact on our mining operations or our customers ability to
use coal and may require us or our customers to significantly change operations or to incur
substantial costs.
While it is not possible to quantify the expenditures we incur to maintain compliance with all
applicable federal and state laws, those costs have been and are expected to continue to be
significant. We post performance bonds pursuant to federal and state mining laws and regulations
for the estimated costs of reclamation and mine closing, including the cost of treating mine water
discharge when necessary. Compliance with these laws has substantially increased the cost of coal
mining for all domestic coal producers.
Clean Air Act. The federal Clean Air Act and similar state and local laws, which regulate emissions
into the air, affect coal mining and processing operations primarily through permitting and
emissions control requirements. The Clean Air Act also indirectly affects coal mining operations by
extensively regulating the emissions from coal-fired industrial boilers and power plants, which are
the largest end-users of our coal. These regulations can take a variety of forms, as explained
below.
The Clean Air Act imposes obligations on the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and the
states to implement regulatory programs that will lead to the attainment and maintenance of
EPA-promulgated ambient air quality standards. EPA has promulgated ambient air quality standards
for a number of air pollutants, including standards for sulfur dioxide, particulate matter,
nitrogen oxides and ozone, which are associated with the combustion
of coal. Owners of coal-fired power plants and industrial boilers have been required to expend
considerable resources in an effort to comply with these ambient air standards. In particular,
coal-fired power plants will be affected by state regulations designed to achieve attainment of the
ambient air quality standard for ozone, which may require significant expenditures for additional
emissions control equipment needed to meet the current national ambient air standard for ozone..
Ozone is produced by the combination of two precursor pollutants: volatile organic compounds and
nitrogen oxides. Nitrogen oxides are a by-product of coal combustion. Accordingly, emissions
control requirements for new and expanded coal-fired power plants and industrial boilers will
continue to become more demanding in the years ahead.
In July 1997, the EPA adopted more stringent ambient air quality standards for ozone and fine
particulate matter (PM2.5, which can be formed in the air from gaseous emissions of
sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides both of which are associated with coal combustion). In a
February 2001 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court largely upheld the EPAs position, although it
remanded the EPAs ozone implementation policy for further consideration. On remand, the Court of
Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the EPAs adoption of these more stringent ambient air
quality standards. As a result of the finalization of these standards, states that are not in
attainment for these standards will have to revise their State Implementation Plans to include
provisions for the control of ozone precursors and/or particulate matter. In April 2004, the EPA
issued final nonattainment designations for the eight-hour ozone standard,
34
and, in December 2004,
issued the final nonattainment standard for PM2.5. States will have to revise their
State Implementation Plans to require electric power generators to further reduce nitrogen oxide
and particulate matter emissions, particularly in designated nonattainment areas. The potential
need to achieve such emissions reductions could result in reduced coal consumption by electric
power generators. Thus, future regulations regarding ozone, particulate matter and other pollutants
could restrict the market for coal and our development of new mines. This in turn may result in
decreased production and a corresponding decrease in our revenues. Although the future scope of
these ozone and particulate matter regulations cannot be predicted, future regulations regarding
these and other ambient air standards could restrict the market for coal and the development of new
mines.
The EPA has also initiated a regional haze program designed to protect and to improve visibility at
and around National Parks, National Wilderness Areas and International Parks, particularly those
located in the southwest and southeast United States. This program restricts the construction of
new coal-fired power plants whose operation may impair visibility at and around federally protected
areas. In June 2005 EPA finalized amendments to the regional haze rules which will require certain
existing coal-fired power plants to install Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) limit
haze-causing emissions, such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter. By imposing
limitations upon the placement and construction of new coal-fired power plants and BART
requirements on existing coal-fired power plants, the EPAs regional haze program could affect the
future market for coal.
New regulations concerning the routine maintenance provisions of the New Source Review program were
published in October 2003. Fourteen states, the District of Columbia and a number of municipalities
filed lawsuits challenging these regulations, and in December 2003 the Court stayed the
effectiveness of these rules. In July 2004 EPA granted a petition to reconsider the legal basis for
the routine maintenance provisions and the litigation was suspended while the rule was bing
reconsidered. In June 2005 EPA issued its final response, which does not change the rule. In
light of EPAs final action the litigation may proceed.
In January 2004, the EPA Administrator announced that EPA would be taking new enforcement actions
against utilities for violations of the existing New Source Review requirements, and shortly
thereafter, EPA issued enforcement notices to several electric utility companies. Additionally,
the U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, has filed lawsuits against several
investor-owned electric utilities for alleged violations of the Clean Air Act. The EPA claims that
these utilities have failed to obtain permits required under the Clean Air Act for alleged major
modifications to their power plants. We supply coal to some of the currently affected utilities,
and it is possible that other of our customers will be sued. These lawsuits could require the
utilities to pay penalties and install pollution control equipment or undertake other emission
reduction measures, which could adversely impact their demand for coal.
In March 2005, the EPA issued two new rules that will impact coal-fired power plants. These are
(i) the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), which permanently caps emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2)
and nitrogen oxides (NOx) in the eastern United States; and (ii) the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR)
to permanently cap and reduce mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants. Both rules provide
power plant operators a market-based system (cap and trade program) in which plants that exceed
federal requirements can sell pollution credits to plant operators who need more time to comply
with the stricter rules. CAIR requires reductions of SO2 and/or NOx emissions across 28 eastern
states and the District of Columbia and, when fully implemented in 2015, CAIR will reduce SO2
emissions in these states by over 70 percent and NOx emissions by over 60 percent from 2003 levels.
Under the new mercury emissions rule, mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants will not be
regulated as a Hazardous Air Pollutant, which would require installation of Maximum Available
Control Technology (MACT). Instead, using the cap and trade system, these plants will have until
2010 to cut mercury emission levels to 38 tons a year from 48 tons and until 2018 to bring that
level down to 15 tons, a 69 percent reduction. Utility analysts have estimated meeting the goals
for SO2 and NOx will cost power generators approximately $50 billion to install the required filtration
systems, or scrubbers, on their smokestacks, but these controls are expected to also reduce the
mercury emissions to the targeted levels. Both the CAIR and the CAMR are the subject of ongoing
litigation challenging key provisions, and in the case of the CAMR, there is an effort in Congress
to overturn the rule in favor of the MACT approach. If CAIR and CAMR survive the legal challenges,
or if a MACT requirement is imposed for mercury emissions, the additional costs that may be
associated with operating coal-fired power generation facilities due to the implementation of these
new rules may render coal a less attractive fuel source.
Other Clean Air Act programs are also applicable to power plants that use our coal. For example,
the acid rain control provisions of Title IV of the Clean Air Act require a reduction of sulfur
dioxide emissions from power plants. Because sulfur is a natural component of coal, required sulfur
dioxide reductions can affect coal mining operations.
35
Title IV imposes a two phase approach to the
implementation of required sulfur dioxide emissions reductions. Phase I, which became effective in
1995, regulated the sulfur dioxide emissions levels from 261 generating units at 110 power plants
and targeted the highest sulfur dioxide emitters. Phase II, implemented January 1, 2000, made the
regulations more stringent and extended them to additional power plants, including all power plants
of greater than 25 megawatt capacity. Affected electric utilities can comply with these
requirements by:
|
|
|
burning lower sulfur coal, either exclusively or mixed with higher sulfur coal; |
|
|
|
|
installing pollution control devices such as scrubbers, which reduce the emissions from high sulfur coal; |
|
|
|
|
reducing electricity generating levels; or |
|
|
|
|
purchasing or trading emissions credits. |
Specific emissions sources receive these credits, which electric utilities and industrial concerns
can trade or sell to allow other units to emit higher levels of sulfur dioxide. Each credit allows
its holder to emit one ton of sulfur dioxide.
Mine Health and Safety Laws. Stringent safety and health standards have been imposed by federal
legislation since the adoption of the Mine Safety and Health Act of 1969. The Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977, which significantly expanded the enforcement of health and safety standards of
the Mine Safety and Health Act of 1969, imposes comprehensive safety and health standards on all
mining operations. In addition, as part of the Mine Safety and Health Acts of 1969 and 1977, the
Black Lung Act requires payments of benefits by all businesses conducting current mining operations
to coal miners with black lung and to some survivors of a miner who dies from this disease.
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. SMCRA establishes operational, reclamation and closure
standards for all aspects of surface mining as well as many aspects of deep mining. SMCRA requires
that comprehensive environmental protection and reclamation standards be met during the course of
and upon completion of mining activities. In conjunction with mining the property, we are
contractually obligated under the terms of our leases to comply with all laws, including SMCRA and
equivalent state and local laws. These obligations include reclaiming and restoring the mined areas
by grading, shaping, preparing the soil for seeding and by seeding with grasses or planting trees
for use as pasture or timberland, as specified in the approved reclamation plan.
SMCRA also requires us to submit a bond or otherwise financially secure the performance of our
reclamation obligations. The earliest a reclamation bond can be completely released is five years
after reclamation has been achieved. Federal law and some states impose on mine operators the
responsibility for repairing the property or compensating the property owners for damage occurring
on the surface of the property as a result of mine subsidence, a consequence of longwall mining and
possibly other mining operations. In addition, the Abandoned Mine Lands Act, which is part of
SMCRA, imposes a tax on all current mining operations, the proceeds of which are used to restore
mines closed before 1977. The maximum tax is $0.35 per ton of coal produced from surface mines and
$0.15 per ton of coal produced from underground mines.
We also lease some of our coal reserves to third party operators. Under SMCRA, responsibility for
unabated violations, unpaid civil penalties and unpaid reclamation fees of independent mine lessees
and other third parties could potentially be imputed to other companies that are deemed, according
to the regulations, to have owned or controlled the mine operator. Sanctions against the
owner or controller are quite severe and can include civil penalties, reclamation fees and
reclamation costs. We are not aware of any currently pending or asserted claims against us
asserting that we own or control any of our lessees operations.
Framework Convention on Global Climate Change. The United States and more than 160 other nations
are signatories to the 1992 Framework Convention on Global Climate Change, commonly known as the
Kyoto Protocol, that is intended to limit or capture emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon
dioxide and methane. The U.S.
Senate has neither ratified the treaty commitments, which would mandate a reduction in U.S.
greenhouse gas emissions, nor enacted any law specifically controlling greenhouse gas emissions and
the Bush Administration has withdrawn support for this treaty. Nonetheless, future regulation of
greenhouse gases could occur either pursuant to future U.S. treaty obligations, statutory or
regulatory changes under the Clean Air Act, or pursuant to laws and
36
regulations enacted by various
states. Efforts to control greenhouse gas emissions could result in reduced demand for coal if
electric power generators switch to lower carbon sources of fuel.
West Virginia Antidegradation Policy. In January 2002, a number of environmental groups and
individuals filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia to
challenge the EPAs approval of West Virginias antidegradation implementation policy. Under the
federal Clean Water Act, state regulatory authorities must conduct an antidegradation review before
approving permits for the discharge of pollutants to waters that have been designated as high
quality by the state. Antidegradation review involves public and intergovernmental scrutiny of
permits and requires permittees to demonstrate that the proposed activities are justified in order
to accommodate significant economic or social development in the area where the waters are located.
In August 2003, the Southern District of West Virginia vacated the EPAs approval of West
Virginias anti-degradation procedures, and remanded the matter to the EPA. On March 29, 2004, EPA
Regions III sent a letter to the WVDEP that approved portions of the states anti-degradation
program, denied approval of portions pending further study, and recommended removal of certain
language on the states regulations. Depending upon the outcome of the DEP review, the issuance or
re-issuance of Clean Water Act permits to us may be delayed or denied, and may increase the costs,
time and difficulty associated with obtaining and complying with Clean Water Act permits for surface
mining operations.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. CERCLA and similar state laws
affect coal mining operations by, among other things, imposing cleanup requirements for threatened
or actual releases of hazardous substances that may endanger public health or welfare or the
environment. Under CERCLA and similar state laws, joint and several liability may be imposed on
waste generators, site owners and lessees and others regardless of fault or the legality of the
original disposal activity. Although the EPA excludes most wastes generated by coal mining and
processing operations from the hazardous waste laws, such wastes can, in certain circumstances,
constitute hazardous substances for the purposes of CERCLA. In addition, the disposal, release or
spilling of some products used by coal companies in operations, such as chemicals, could implicate
the liability provisions of the statute. Thus, coal mines that we currently own or have previously
owned or operated, and sites to which we sent waste materials, may be subject to liability under
CERCLA and similar state laws. In particular, we may be liable under CERCLA or similar state laws
for the cleanup of hazardous substance contamination at sites where we own surface rights.
Mining Permits and Approvals. Mining companies must obtain numerous permits that strictly regulate
environmental and health and safety matters in connection with coal mining, some of which have
significant bonding requirements. In connection with obtaining these permits and approvals, we may
be required to prepare and present to federal, state or local authorities data pertaining to the
effect or impact that any proposed production of coal may have upon the environment. The
requirements imposed by any of these authorities may be costly and time consuming and may delay
commencement or continuation of mining operations. Regulations also provide that a mining permit
can be refused or revoked if an officer, director or a shareholder with a 10% or greater interest
in the entity is affiliated with another entity that has outstanding permit violations. Thus, past
or ongoing violations of federal and state mining laws could provide a basis to revoke existing
permits and to deny the issuance of additional permits.
Regulatory authorities exercise considerable discretion in the timing of permit issuance. Also,
private individuals and the public at large possess rights to comment on and otherwise engage in
the permitting process, including through intervention in the courts. Accordingly, the permits we
need for our mining operations may not be issued, or, if issued, may not be issued in a timely
fashion, or may involve requirements that may be changed or interpreted in a manner that restricts
our ability to conduct our mining operations or to do so profitably.
In order to obtain mining permits and approvals from state regulatory authorities, mine operators,
including us, must submit a reclamation plan for restoring, upon the completion of mining
operations, the mined property to its prior condition, productive use or other permitted condition.
Typically we submit the necessary permit applications several months before we plan to begin mining
a new area. In our experience, permits generally are approved several months after a completed
application is submitted. In the past, we have generally obtained our mining permits without
significant delay. However, we cannot be sure that we will not experience difficulty in obtaining
mining permits in the future.
Future legislation and administrative regulations may emphasize the protection of the environment
and, as a consequence, the activities of mine operators, including us, may be more closely
regulated. Legislation and regulations, as well as future interpretations of existing laws, may
also require substantial increases in equipment
37
expenditures and operating costs, as well as
delays, interruptions or the termination of operations. We cannot predict the possible effect of
such regulatory changes.
Under some circumstances, substantial fines and penalties, including revocation or suspension of
mining permits, may be imposed under the laws described above. Monetary sanctions and, under some
circumstances, criminal sanctions may be imposed for failure to comply with these laws.
Surety Bonds. Federal and state laws require us to obtain surety bonds to guarantee performance or
payment of certain long-term obligations including mine closure and reclamation costs, federal and
state workers compensation benefits, coal leases and other miscellaneous obligations. It has
become increasingly difficult for us to secure new surety bonds or retain existing bonds without
the posting of collateral. In addition, surety bond costs have increased and the market terms of
such bonds have generally become more unfavorable. We may be unable to maintain our surety bonds or
acquire new bonds in the future due to lack of availability, higher expense, unfavorable market
terms, or an inability to post sufficient collateral. Our failure to maintain, or inability to
acquire, surety bonds that are required by state and federal law would have a material adverse
impact on us.
Endangered Species. The federal Endangered Species Act and counterpart state legislation protects
species threatened with possible extinction. Protection of endangered species may have the effect
of prohibiting or delaying us from obtaining mining permits and may include restrictions on timber
harvesting, road building and other mining or agricultural activities in areas containing the
affected species. A number of species indigenous to our properties are protected under the
Endangered Species Act. Based on the species that have been identified to date and the current
application of applicable laws and regulations, however, we do not believe there are any species
protected under the Endangered Species Act that would materially and adversely affect our ability
to mine coal from our properties in accordance with current mining plans.
Other Environmental Laws Affecting Us. We are required to comply with numerous other federal, state
and local environmental laws in addition to those previously discussed. These additional laws
include, for example, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the
Toxic Substance Control Act and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act. We believe
that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws.
Competition
The coal industry is intensely competitive, primarily as a result of the existence of numerous
producers in the coal-producing regions in which we operate, and some of our competitors may have
greater financial resources. We compete with several major coal producers in the Central
Appalachian and Powder River Basin areas. We also compete with a number of smaller producers in
those and other market regions.
Electric Industry Factors
Demand for coal and the prices that we will be able to obtain for our coal are closely linked to
coal consumption patterns of the domestic electric generation industry, which has accounted for
approximately 90% of domestic coal consumption in recent years. These coal consumption patterns are
influenced by factors beyond our control, including the demand for electricity (which is dependent
to a significant extent on summer and winter temperatures and the strength of the economy);
government regulation; technological developments and the location, availability, quality and price
of competing sources of coal; other fuels such as natural gas, oil and nuclear; and alternative
energy sources such as hydroelectric power. Demand for our low-sulfur coal and the prices that we
will be able to obtain for it will also be affected by the price and availability of high-sulfur
coal, which can be marketed in tandem with emissions allowances in order to meet federal Clean Air
Act requirements. Any reduction in the demand for our coal by the domestic electric generation
industry may cause a decline in profitability.
Electric utility deregulation is expected to provide incentives to generators of electricity to
minimize their fuel costs and is believed to have caused electric generators to be more aggressive
in negotiating prices with coal suppliers. Deregulation may have an adverse effect on our
profitability to the extent it causes our customers to be more cost-sensitive.
38
In addition, our ability to receive payment for coal sold and delivered depends on the
creditworthiness of our customers. In general, the creditworthiness of our customers has
deteriorated over the past several years. If such trends continue, our acceptable customer base may
be limited.
Terms of Long-Term Coal Supply Contracts
During 2004, sales of coal under long-term contracts, which are contracts with a term greater than
12 months, accounted for 70% of our total revenues. The prices for coal shipped under these
contracts may be below the current market price for similar type coal at any given time. For the
six months ended June 30, 2005, the weighted average price of coal sold under our long-term
contracts was $17.85 per ton. As a consequence of the substantial volume of our sales which are
subject to these long-term agreements, we have less coal available with which to capitalize on
stronger coal prices if and when they arise. In addition, because long-term contracts may allow the
customer to elect volume flexibility, our ability to realize the higher prices that may be
available on the spot market may be restricted when customers elect to purchase higher volumes
under such contracts. Our exposure to market-based pricing may also be increased should customers
elect to purchase fewer tons. In addition, the increasingly short terms of sales contracts and the
consequent absence of price adjustment provisions in such contracts make it more likely that we
will not be able to recover inflation related increases in mining costs during the contract term.
Reserve Degradation and Depletion
Our profitability depends substantially on our ability to mine coal reserves that have the
geological characteristics that enable them to be mined at competitive costs. Replacement reserves
may not be available when required or, if available, may not be capable of being mined at costs
comparable to those characteristics of the depleting mines. We have in the past acquired and will
in the future acquire coal reserves for our mine portfolio from third parties. We may not be able
to accurately assess the geological characteristics of any reserves that we acquire, which may
adversely affect our profitability and financial condition. Exhaustion of reserves at particular
mines can also have an adverse effect on operating results that is disproportionate to the
percentage of overall production represented by such mines. Mingo Logans Mountaineer Mine is
estimated to exhaust its longwall mineable reserves in the first quarter of 2007, although we
expect to make up the lost production with our planned opening of our Mountain Laurel complex in
Logan County, West Virginia, which should ramp up to full production in mid-2007. The Mountaineer
Mine generated $30.5 million and $26.1 million of our total operating income in the years ended
2004 and 2003, respectively.
Potential Fluctuations in Operating Results Factors Routinely Affecting Results of Operations
Our mining operations are inherently subject to changing conditions that can affect levels of
production and production costs at particular mines for varying lengths of time and can result in
decreases in profitability. Weather conditions, equipment replacement or repair, fuel and supply
prices, insurance costs, fires, variations in coal seam thickness, amounts of overburden rock and
other natural materials, and other geological conditions have had, and can be expected in the
future to have, a significant impact on operating results. A prolonged disruption of production at
any of our principal mines, particularly the Mingo Logan operation in West Virginia or Black
Thunder mine in Wyoming, would result in a decrease, which could be material, in our revenues and
profitability.
The geological characteristics of Central Appalachia coal reserves, such as depth of overburden and
coal seam thickness, make them complex and costly to mine. As mines become depleted, replacement
reserves may not be available when required or, if available, may not be capable of being mined at
costs comparable to those characteristic of the depleting mines. In addition, as compared to mines
in the Powder River Basin, permitting and licensing and other environmental and regulatory
requirements are more costly and time-consuming to satisfy. These factors could materially
adversely affect the mining operations and cost structures of, and customers ability to use coal
produced by, operators in Central Appalachia, including us.
Other factors affecting the production and sale of our coal that could result in decreases in
profitability include: (i) expiration or termination of, or sales price redeterminations or
suspension of deliveries under, coal supply agreements; (ii) disruption or increases in the cost of
transportation services; (iii) changes in laws or regulations, including permitting requirements;
(iv) litigation; (v) work stoppages or other labor difficulties; (vi) mine worker vacation
schedules and related maintenance activities; and (vii) changes in coal market and general economic
conditions.
39
Transportation
The coal industry depends on rail, trucking and barge transportation to deliver shipments of coal
to customers, and transportation costs are a significant component of the total cost of supplying
coal. Disruption or insufficient availability of these transportation services could temporarily
impair our ability to supply coal to customers and thus adversely affect our business and the
results of our operations. As described in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition-Outlook section of this Form 10-Q, we have experienced significant disruptions in rail
service in two of the regions in which we operate in the past few months. In addition, increases
in transportation costs associated with our coal, or increases in our transportation costs relative
to transportation costs for coal produced by our competitors or of other fuels, could adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
Reserves Title; Leasehold Interests
We base our reserve information on geological data assembled and analyzed by our staff, which
includes various engineers and geologists, and periodically reviewed by outside firms. The reserve
estimates are annually updated to reflect production of coal from the reserves and new drilling or
other data received. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of
recoverable reserves, including many factors beyond our control. Estimates of
economically recoverable coal reserves and net cash flows necessarily depend upon a number of
variable factors and assumptions, such as geological and mining conditions which may not be fully
identified by available exploration data or may differ from experience in current operations,
historical production from the area compared with production from other producing areas, the
assumed effects of regulation by governmental agencies, and assumptions concerning coal prices,
operating costs, severance and excise taxes, development costs, and reclamation costs, all of which
may cause estimates to vary considerably from actual results.
For these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable quantities attributable to any
particular group of properties, classifications of such reserves based on risk of recovery and
estimates of net cash flows expected therefrom, prepared by different engineers or by the same
engineers at different times, may vary substantially. Actual coal tonnage recovered from identified
reserve areas or properties, and revenues and expenditures with respect to our reserves, may vary
from estimates, and such variances may be material. These estimates thus may not accurately reflect
our actual reserves.
Most of our mining operations are conducted on properties we lease. The loss of any lease could
adversely affect our ability to develop the associated reserves. Because title to most of our
leased properties and mineral rights is not usually verified until we have made a commitment to
develop a property, which may not occur until after we have obtained necessary permits and
completed exploration of the property, our right to mine certain of our reserves may be adversely
affected if defects in title or boundaries exist. In order to obtain leases or mining contracts to
conduct mining operations on property where these defects exist, we have had to, and may in the
future have to, incur unanticipated costs. In addition, we may not be able to successfully
negotiate new leases or mining contracts for properties containing additional reserves or maintain
our leasehold interests in properties on which mining operations are not commenced during the term
of the lease.
Acquisitions
We continually seek to expand our operations and coal reserves in the regions in which we operate
through acquisitions of businesses and assets, including leases of coal reserves. Acquisition
transactions involve inherent risks, such as:
|
|
|
uncertainties in assessing the value, strengths, weaknesses, contingent and other
liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition or other transaction candidates; |
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key personnel of an acquired business; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to achieve identified operating and financial synergies anticipated to
result from an acquisition or other transaction; |
|
|
|
|
problems that could arise from the integration of the acquired business; |
40
|
|
|
unanticipated changes in business, industry or general economic conditions that affect
the assumptions underlying the acquisition or other transaction rationale; and |
|
|
|
|
unexpected development costs, such as those related to the development of the Little
Thunder reserves, that adversely affect our profitability. |
Any one or more of these factors could cause us not to realize the benefits anticipated to result
from the acquisition of businesses or assets.
Post Retirement Benefits
We estimate our future postretirement medical and pension benefit obligations based on various
assumptions, including:
|
|
|
actuarial estimates; |
|
|
|
|
assumed discount rates; |
|
|
|
|
estimates of mine lives; |
|
|
|
|
expected returns on pension plan assets; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in health care costs. |
Based on changes in our assumptions, our annual postretirement health and pension benefit costs
have increased. If our assumptions relating to these benefits change in the future, our costs could
further increase, which would reduce our profitability. In addition, future regulatory and
accounting changes relating to these benefits could result in increased obligations or additional
costs, which could also have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
On January 1, 1998, we replaced our existing pension plans with a new cash balance pension plan.
The accrued benefits of active participants under the former plans were vested as of that date and
the participants cash balance account was credited with the present value of the participants
earned pension benefit, payable at normal retirement age. On February 12, 2004, in an unrelated
case involving International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Illinois affirmed its earlier ruling that the cash balance
formula used in IBMs conversion to a cash balance plan violated the age discrimination provisions
under ERISA. IBM has announced that it will appeal the decision to the Seventh Circuit Court of
Appeals. The Illinois District Courts decision conflicts with the decisions of two other district
courts and with proposed regulations for cash balance plans issued by Treasury and the IRS in
December 2002. In addition, on February 2, 2004, the Treasury Department proposed legislation that
would clarify that cash balance plans do not violate the age discrimination rules that apply to
pension plans as long as they treat older workers at least as well as younger workers. The
retirement account formula used for our pension plan may not meet the standard ultimately set forth
in the IBM Courts decision. Consequently, the IBM decision may have an impact on our and other
companies cash balance pension plans. The effect of the IBM decision on our cash balance plan or
our financial position has not been determined at this time.
Certain Contractual Arrangements
Our affiliate, Arch Western Resources, LLC, is the owner of our reserves and mining facilities in
the Powder River Basin and Western Bituminous regions of the United States. The agreement under
which Arch Western was formed provides that a subsidiary of ours, as the managing member of Arch
Western, generally has exclusive power and authority to conduct, manage and control the business of
Arch Western. However, consent of BP p.l.c., the other member of Arch Western, would generally be
required in the event that Arch Western proposes to make a distribution, incur indebtedness, sell
properties or merge or consolidate with any other entity if, at such time, Arch Western has a debt
rating less favorable than specified ratings with Moodys Investors Service or Standard & Poors or
fails to meet specified indebtedness and interest ratios.
In connection with our June 1, 1998 acquisition of Atlantic Richfield Companys (ARCO) coal
operations, we entered into an agreement under which we agreed to indemnify ARCO against specified
tax liabilities in the event
41
that these liabilities arise as a result of certain actions taken
prior to June 1, 2013, including the sale or other disposition of certain properties of Arch
Western, the repurchase of certain equity interests in Arch Western by Arch Western, or the
reduction under certain circumstances of indebtedness incurred by Arch Western in connection with
the acquisition. ARCO was acquired by BP p.l.c. in 2000. Depending on the time at which any such
indemnification obligation was to arise, it could impact our profitability for the period in which
it arises.
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation requires the affirmative vote of the holders
of at least two-thirds of outstanding common stock voting thereon to approve a merger or
consolidation and certain other fundamental actions involving or affecting control of us. Our
Bylaws require the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the members of our Board of Directors
in order to declare dividends and to authorize certain other actions.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by this Item is contained under the caption Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report and is incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The information required by this Item is contained under the caption Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report and is incorporated
herein by reference.
42
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information required by this Item is contained in the Contingencies Legal Contingencies
section of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in this report and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Nothing to report under this item.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Nothing to report under this item.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Nothing to report under this item.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Nothing to report under this item.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Arch Coal, Inc. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended
March 31, 2000) |
|
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Arch Coal, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2
to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2000) |
|
3.3 |
|
Certificate of Designations Establishing the Designations, Powers, Preferences, Rights,
Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions of the Companys 5% Perpetual Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3 to current report on
Form 8-A filed on March 5, 2003) |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARCH COAL, INC. |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2005
|
|
/s/ John W. Lorson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John W. Lorson |
|
|
|
|
Controller |
|
|
|
|
(Chief Accounting Officer) |
|
|
44
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
I, Steven F. Leer, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Coal, Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date:
August 5, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven F. Leer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven F. Leer |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
I, Robert J. Messey, certify that:
|
1. |
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Arch Coal, Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
(a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared; |
|
|
(b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
(c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and |
|
|
(d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and |
|
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): |
|
(a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and |
|
|
(b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Messey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Messey |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arch Coal, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, Steven F. Leer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven F. Leer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven F. Leer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Arch Coal, Inc. and will be retained by Arch Coal, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arch Coal, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, Robert J. Messey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Messey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Messey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 5, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Arch Coal, Inc. and will be retained by Arch Coal, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.