corresp
[ARCH
COAL, INC. LETTERHEAD]
May 25, 2006
VIA EDGAR AND FACSIMILE
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549-7010
Attn: Karl Hiller, Branch Chief
|
|
|
Re:
|
|
Arch Western Resources, LLC |
|
|
Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Filed March 30, 2006 |
|
|
File No. 333-107569-03 |
Dear Mr. Hiller:
I am writing this letter on behalf of Arch Western Resources (the Company) in response to
the comment letter of the Staff of the Commission dated May 12, 2006 regarding the above-referenced
periodic report. This letter sets forth each comment of the Staff in the comment letter (numbered
in accordance with the comment letter) and, following each comment, sets forth the Companys
response. In summary, the Company believes the Staffs comments with regard to the
above-referenced periodic report relate to items that are not material to the understanding of the
Company, its business or financial statements. The Company believes that amendments of existing
SEC filings should be limited to items that are significant in nature and that could have a
meaningful impact on a reasonable investors evaluation of the financial results and financial
condition of the Company, taken as a whole. Accordingly, the Company does not believe any of the
items rise to such level of significance as to warrant an amendment to the Form 10-K previously
filed with the SEC. However, in the spirit of enhancing overall financial disclosures, the Company
commits to including many of the suggested disclosures in its future Form 10-K and/or Form 10-Q
filings, as specifically noted in the following responses.
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
General
1. |
|
Please correct your Commission File Number indicated on the cover of your annual report to be
333-107569-03, rather than 1-13105, which corresponds to your parent company and not to you. |
The Company included the incorrect Commission file number on the cover page due to an
administrative oversight. The Company will include the correct file number with all future SEC
filings.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Contractual Obligations, page 37
2. |
|
We note that you have not included certain long-term liabilities, such as postretirement
benefits, asset retirement, workers compensation and other non-current liabilities, in your
table of contractual obligations. Item 303(5)(i) of |
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
May 25, 2006
Page 2
|
|
Regulation S-K requires other long-term liabilities that are reflected on your balance sheet
under GAAP to be listed in the table. If you believe the nature of these other long term
liabilities differs substantially from those presently shown, you may opt for both
quantification and discussion of the excluded items in a narrative adjacent to the table.
Further, please include a total column aggregating the obligations in your table. |
The Company proposes to revise the disclosure in its Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2006 and in future Form 10-K filings to include the following disclosure:
Our consolidated balance sheet reflects a liability of $144.4 million for asset
retirement obligations at their fair value. The determination of the fair value of asset
retirement obligations involves a number of estimates, as discussed in the section entitled
Critical Accounting Policies included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005, including the timing of payments to satisfy asset retirement obligations.
The timing of payments to satisfy asset retirement obligations is based on numerous factors,
including mine closure dates. You should see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 for more
information on our asset retirement obligations.
The contractual obligations table contained in the section entitled Contractual
Obligations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005
also excludes certain other obligations reflected in our consolidated balance sheet, including
estimated funding for pension and postretirement benefit obligations, for which the timing of
payments may vary based on changes in the fair value of plan assets (for pension obligations)
and actuarial assumptions, and payments under our self-insured
workers' compensation program. You should see the section entitled Critical Accounting Policies
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 for more
information about these assumptions. There is no minimum funding requirement for our pension
plans in 2006. You should see Notes 10 and 12 to our consolidated financial statements included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 for more information about the
amounts we have recorded for workers' compensation and pension and postretirement benefit obligations.
The
Company plans to include a total column in any contractual
obligations table contained in future Form 10-K and/or Form 10-Q
filings.
Financial Statements
Statements of Cash Flows, page F-5
3. |
|
We note that you have recorded a cash outflow of $108,600,000 for capital expenditures in the
investing section of your statement of cash flows. Please tell us how this amount reconciles
to the changes depicted in the related line items on your balance sheet. |
|
|
Attached as Exhibit A to this letter is a schedule of changes in net plant, property and
equipment. |
Note 18 Cash Flow, page F-18
4. |
|
We note that you report increases in receivables from Arch Coal, Inc. within the line item
Changes in operating assets and liabilities in calculating the cash provided by or used in
operating activities in your Statements of Cash Flows. However, in discussing the increase in
cash provided by operating activities in 2005 on page 36, you identify as a factor in this
increase, ...the significant increase in our receivable from Arch Coal in 2004 which resulted
from the borrowings that we made in 2004 that were loaned to Arch Coal. While the logic in
your attribution is unclear, given this disclosure, coupled with that of your loans to Arch
Coal on pages 37 and F-16, clarifying that this receivable is interest bearing and payable on
demand, we would expect to see these transactions classified as investing activities in your
Statements of Cash Flows in accordance with paragraph 17(a) of SFAS 95. Accordingly, please
amend your financial statements to comply with this guidance or explain to us why you believe
it does not apply to you. |
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company revised the manner in which it reports
changes in the net receivable from Arch Coal in its Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows to reflect
such changes as
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
May 25, 2006
Page 3
investing activities. Please see page 3 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006. Also, the Company has described in Note 1 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2006 the reason for the change and the impact on the Companys consolidated
statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. The Company plans to reflect this change in all
future filings and to revise prior period information to conform to this presentation.
5. |
|
We note that you have recorded prepaid royalties as cash flows from investing activities on
your Statements of Cash Flows which, we understand from your disclosure in Note 2 on page F-8,
are attributed to the rights to leased coal lands recoupable against your production. It is
unclear why you have characterized this transaction as cash flows used in investing activities
since changes in prepaid assets on the balance sheet and amounts expensed to cost of sales
would ordinarily be reflected in operating cash flows. Please tell us why you believe these
payments should be considered acquisitions of property; describe the mechanism by which such
payments are recouped, and identify the particular characteristics you believe differentiate
these arrangements from typical royalty payments that should be reported as operating cash
flows. Further, for each year presented, tell us how much of the prepaid assets recorded were
subsequently expensed in the same period. |
Advance mining royalties are payments for mineral rights that are similar to leased coal
interests in that they establish control over specified coal reserve areas. These advance
royalties are not refundable if not recouped through production,
which distinguishes them from production royalties that are due as
mining occurs. Additionally, EITF Issue No. 04-2
defines mineral rights as tangible productive assets. Paragraph 17c of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows, states that payments to acquire productive
assets should be included in cash outflows from investing activities. The Company has historically
recorded these advance payments as prepaid assets. As mining occurs on these properties and the
royalties are recouped, the asset is amortized on a units of production basis and the amortization
is charged to cost of sales and reflected as an adjustment in reconciling net income to cash flows
from operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The Company believes this treatment of
advance royalties in the statement of cash flows is consistent with others in the Companys
industry.
During 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company made prepaid royalty payments of $12.8 million, $14.6
million and $12.7 million, respectively, and recouped $12.7 million, $10.1 million and $10.0
million, respectively, of previously-recorded prepaid royalties.
Engineering Comments
Properties, page 27
6. |
|
In your Our Reserves section, you indicate that your most recent third party review of your
reserve estimates was conducted by Weir International Mining Consultants in February 2006.
Please provide our engineer with a copy of this report. If it is available in pdf format,
please provide it on a disk. |
|
|
|
The Company has supplementally provided Mr. Baer the information requested by the Staff. |
In addition, the Company hereby acknowledges that (i) the Company is responsible for the
adequacy and accuracy of the disclosures in the filings, (ii) Staff comments or changes to
disclosures in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action
with respect to the filings and (iii) the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any
proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the
United States.
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
May 25, 2006
Page 4
If you require any additional information on these issues, or if I can provide you with any
other information that will facilitate your continued review of these filings, please contact
Robert J. Messey at (314) 994-2930 or me at your earliest convenience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
/s/ Gregory A. Billhartz
Gregory A. Billhartz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cc:
|
|
Robert J. Messey |
|
|
|
|
|
Craig Desnoyer |
|
|
Ernst & Young LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
Tracie Towner
|
|
|
Roger Baer |
|
|
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
Exhibit A
Arch Western Resources LLC
Rollforward of Plant, Property and Equipment, net
Year ended 12/31/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NBV of |
|
|
ARO |
|
|
Other/Non- |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
12/31/04 |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
|
DDA |
|
|
Disposals |
|
|
Estimates |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
12/31/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant, Property and Equipment |
|
$ |
1,771,417 |
|
|
$ |
108,600 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(60,890 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,472) |
3) |
|
$ |
(933 |
) |
|
$ |
1,815,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
669,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,842 |
|
|
|
(31,019 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
747,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,101,674 |
|
|
$ |
108,600 |
|
|
$ |
(108,842 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,871 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,472 |
) |
|
$ |
(930 |
) |
|
$ |
1,068,159 |
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation to amounts in statement
of cash flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(108,600 |
) |
|
$ |
108,842 |
|
|
$ |
29,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Contract Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,495) |
1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferral of gain on sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value of inventory sold included in proceeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount reflected in statement of cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(108,600 |
) |
|
$ |
98,347 |
A |
|
$ |
37,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal on statement of cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount reflected in statement of cash flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,230 |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Represents amortization of sales contract acquisition costs included in Depreciation, depletion and amortization in the statement of cash flows.
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further description of sales contract amortization |
|
2) |
|
Represents the deferral of gain on the sale and leaseback of certain facilities. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
description. |
|
3) |
|
Represents the adjustments to capitalized asset retirement cost resulting from revisions in estimates. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further description. Differences between the amount of adjustment to the liability for asset retirement obligations and the asset retirement cost
result from obligations that are not associated with operating properties. |